On 21/08/2013 15:49, P.V.Anthony wrote:
On 14/07/2013 06:08, Nigel Kukard wrote:
On 07/12/2013 02:34 AM, P.V.Anthony wrote:
Hi,

Currently using policyd version 2.0.12 on centos 6 64bit with postfix.

Activated the SPF module with add-header and not to reject.

In the logs it is showing action=add-header but in the email source
there do not seem to have the header added.

Is anyone also using SPF module with add-header function?

P.V.Anthony

Is there any other verdicts taking place? remember the postfix policy
delegation protocol can only return 1 verdict

For incoming email, SPF and Greylisting are active.

In the logs it does show that CheckSPF is done first then Greylisting.

Could that be the reason?

Here is an example.

Aug 21 23:42:39 servername cbpolicyd[17030]: module=CheckSPF, action=add_header, host=202.40.249.76, helo=cp-prod-avas-8.fuse.kc2.sg.local, [email protected], [email protected], reason=spf_softfail

Aug 21 23:42:39 servername cbpolicyd[17030]: module=Greylisting, action=pass, host=202.40.249.76, helo=cp-prod-avas-8.fuse.kc2.sg.local, [email protected], to=user@example, reason=auto-whitelisted

Is there some other setting I need to do so that the SPF headers can be seen?

Postfix only supports 1 verdict, add_header could possibly be overriden by "pass" although I'm very sure I added code to make add_header remain...

Try shove policyd in full debugging mode for protocols too and see what its sending back.

-N

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.policyd.org/mailman/listinfo/users_lists.policyd.org

Reply via email to