On 07/02/2012 04:00 PM, Robert Anderson wrote:
> On 02/07/2012 10:39, Tiemen Ruiten wrote:
>> All these messages have been rejected because there are syntax errors in
>> the SPF-records (you can look them up with a dig-query)
>> The RFC states the following:
>>
>> After one SPF record has been selected, the check_host() function parses
>> and interprets it to find a result for the current test. If there are
>> any syntax errors, check_host() returns immediately with the result
>> "PermError".
>>
>> As far as I know there is no option in the webinterface or in the config
>> file to handle "PermError" any other way than a SPF "Fail" (for example
>> accept and mark, or plain accept). I'm wondering if there's a way to add
>> this functionality?
>
> Could you add it as a feature request to
> http://devlabs.linuxassist.net/projects/policyd/ describing ideas for
> behaviour on failed SPF checks?
>
Done: https://devlabs.linuxassist.net/issues/250
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.policyd.org/mailman/listinfo/users
