Nigel, Tobias,

> Tobias J Kreidl wrote:
> > Seems like one solution would be to route email for specific domains
> > through specific mail gateways, each of which has its own specific
> > message size restriction.  So, route according to the MX records to
> the
> > appropriate server instance.  So much can be virtualized these days
> for
> > little or no cost that this should not be an issue.
> >
> >
> I suppose one could also choose to *trust* the ESMTP size .... and
make
> a module based on that, then just flat out reject the entire mail if
> the
> DATA size is different to the EMSTP size

Your argumentation is simple and clear. It is really not so easy to
implement a such policy.

Thanks,

rocsca

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.policyd.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to