Hi, I created a new vnet based on the following template:
--- template start --- NAME = "v-test01" TYPE = "ranged" BRIDGE = "uplink" CLUSTER = "kvm_cluster" NETWORK_ADDRESS = 172.17.226.0 NETWORK_MASK = 255.255.255.224 IP_START = 172.17.226.4 IP_END = 172.17.226.30 GATEWAY = 172.17.226.1 VLAN = "YES" VLAN_ID = 226 --- template end --- After creation the vnet is not a member of the kvm_cluster but instead of the default cluster "-". Is this a bug or is it me doing it wrong? After reading [1] again it explicitly states a "vnet or datastore" should be added with the onecluster add command, so I was doing it wrong. It still would be nice to have it automatically added to a cluster if "CLUSTER" attribute is there. After that I instantiated a vm based on a template with a mix of resources from "kvm_cluster" and "-" (v-test01). This vm succesfully managed to get into running state. According to [1] section "The Default Cluster 'None'" hosts in the Cluster 'none' will only run VMs using resources without a cluster. I assume this is equally true for hosts that are a member of a non-default cluster (kvm_cluster in our case) but instead it did run the vm. Indeed, according to "The "Scheduling and Cluster" section of [1] the deployment should have failed. What info do we need to make sure it's a bug and not PEBKAC? Gr. Stefan [1]: http://docs.opennebula.org/4.4/administration/hosts_and_clusters/cluster_guide.html -- | BIT BV http://www.bit.nl/ Kamer van Koophandel 09090351 | GPG: 0xD14839C6 +31 318 648 688 / i...@bit.nl _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
