You can pick one test, make it standalone, and open an issue on GitHub. How does (vanilla) Open MPI compare to your vendor Open MPI based library?
Cheers, Gilles On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:20 PM Dave Love via users < users@lists.open-mpi.org> wrote: > Gilles Gouaillardet via users <users@lists.open-mpi.org> writes: > > > Dave, > > > > If there is a bug you would like to report, please open an issue at > > https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/issues and provide all the required > > information > > (in this case, it should also include the UCX library you are using and > how > > it was obtained or built). > > There are hundreds of failures I was interested in resolving with the > latest versions, though I think somewhat fewer than with previous UCX > versions. > > I'd like to know how it's recommended I should build to ensure I'm > starting from the right place for any investigation. Possible interplay > between OMPI and UCX options seems worth understanding specifically, and > I think it's reasonable to ask how to configure things to work together > generally, when there are so many options without much explanation. > > I have tried raising issues previously without much luck but, given the > number of failures, something is fundamentally wrong, and I doubt you > want the output from the whole set. > > Perhaps the MPICH test set in a "portable" configuration is expected to > fail with OMPI for some reason, and someone can comment on that. > However, it's the only comprehensive set I know is available, and > originally even IMB crashed, so I'm not inclined to blame the tests > initially, and wonder how this stuff is tested.
