Calls to process_vm_readv() and process_vm_writev() are disabled in the default 
Docker seccomp 
profile<https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/master/profiles/seccomp/default.json>.
 You can add the docker flag --cap-add=SYS_PTRACE or better yet modify the 
seccomp profile so that process_vm_readv and process_vm_writev are whitelisted, 
by adding them to the syscalls.names list.

You can also disable seccomp, and several other confinement and security 
features, if you prefer a heavy handed approach:

$ docker run --privileged --security-opt label=disable --security-opt 
seccomp=unconfined --security-opt apparmor=unconfined --ipc=host --network=host 
...

If you're still having trouble after fixing the above you may need to check 
yama on the host. You can check with "sysctl -w kernel.yama.ptrace_scope", if 
it returns a value other than 0 you may need to disable it with "sysctl -w 
kernel.yama.ptrace_scope=0".

Adam

________________________________
From: users <users-boun...@lists.open-mpi.org> on behalf of Matt Thompson via 
users <users@lists.open-mpi.org>
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 5:15 PM
To: Open MPI Users <users@lists.open-mpi.org>
Cc: Matt Thompson <fort...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Help with One-Sided Communication: Works in Intel 
MPI, Fails in Open MPI

External email: Use caution opening links or attachments

Nathan,

The reproducer would be that code that's on the Intel website. That is what I 
was running. You could pull my image if you like but...since you are the genius:

[root@adac3ce0cf32 ~]# mpirun --mca btl_vader_single_copy_mechanism none -np 2 
./a.out
Rank 0 running on adac3ce0cf32
Rank 1 running on adac3ce0cf32
Rank 0 sets data in the shared memory: 00 01 02 03
Rank 1 sets data in the shared memory: 10 11 12 13
Rank 0 gets data from the shared memory: 10 11 12 13
Rank 0 has new data in the shared memory: 00 01 02 03
Rank 1 gets data from the shared memory: 00 01 02 03
Rank 1 has new data in the shared memory: 10 11 12 13

And knowing this led to: https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/issues/4948

So, good news is that setting export 
OMPI_MCA_btl_vader_single_copy_mechanism=none let's a lot of stuff work. The 
bad news is we seem to be using MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE and it does not like it:

    Start 2: pFIO_tests_mpi

2: Test command: /opt/openmpi-4.0.2/bin/mpiexec "-n" "18" "-oversubscribe" 
"/root/project/MAPL/build/bin/pfio_ctest_io.x" "-nc" "6" "-nsi" "6" "-nso" "6" 
"-ngo" "1" "-ngi" "1" "-v" "T,U" "-s" "mpi"
2: Test timeout computed to be: 1500
2: --------------------------------------------------------------------------
2: The OSC pt2pt component does not support MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE in this release.
2: Workarounds are to run on a single node, or to use a system with an RDMA
2: capable network such as Infiniband.
2: --------------------------------------------------------------------------
2: [adac3ce0cf32:03619] *** An error occurred in MPI_Win_create
2: [adac3ce0cf32:03619] *** reported by process [270073857,16]
2: [adac3ce0cf32:03619] *** on communicator MPI COMMUNICATOR 4 DUP FROM 3
2: [adac3ce0cf32:03619] *** MPI_ERR_WIN: invalid window
2: [adac3ce0cf32:03619] *** MPI_ERRORS_ARE_FATAL (processes in this 
communicator will now abort,
2: [adac3ce0cf32:03619] ***    and potentially your MPI job)
2: [adac3ce0cf32:03587] 17 more processes have sent help message 
help-osc-pt2pt.txt / mpi-thread-multiple-not-supported
2: [adac3ce0cf32:03587] Set MCA parameter "orte_base_help_aggregate" to 0 to 
see all help / error messages
2: [adac3ce0cf32:03587] 17 more processes have sent help message 
help-mpi-errors.txt / mpi_errors_are_fatal
2/5 Test #2: pFIO_tests_mpi ...................***Failed    0.18 sec

40% tests passed, 3 tests failed out of 5

Total Test time (real) =   1.08 sec

The following tests FAILED:
          2 - pFIO_tests_mpi (Failed)
          3 - pFIO_tests_simple (Failed)
          4 - pFIO_tests_hybrid (Failed)
Errors while running CTest

The weird thing is, I *am* running on one node (it's all I have, I'm not fancy 
enough at AWS to try more yet) and ompi_info does mention MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE:

[root@adac3ce0cf32 build]# ompi_info | grep -i mult
          Thread support: posix (MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE: yes, OPAL support: yes, 
OMPI progress: no, ORTE progress: yes, Event lib: yes)

Any ideas on this one?

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 7:24 PM Nathan Hjelm via users 
<users@lists.open-mpi.org<mailto:users@lists.open-mpi.org>> wrote:
The error is from btl/vader. CMA is not functioning as expected. It might work 
if you set btl_vader_single_copy_mechanism=none

Performance will suffer though. It would be worth understanding with 
process_readv is failing.

Can you send a simple reproducer?

-Nathan

On Feb 24, 2020, at 2:59 PM, Gabriel, Edgar via users 
<users@lists.open-mpi.org<mailto:users@lists.open-mpi.org>> wrote:



I am not an expert for the one-sided code in Open MPI, I wanted to comment 
briefly on the potential MPI -IO related item. As far as I can see, the error 
message



“Read -1, expected 48, errno = 1”


does not stem from MPI I/O, at least not from the ompio library. What file 
system did you use for these tests?



Thanks

Edgar



From: users 
<users-boun...@lists.open-mpi.org<mailto:users-boun...@lists.open-mpi.org>> On 
Behalf Of Matt Thompson via users
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 1:20 PM
To: users@lists.open-mpi.org<mailto:users@lists.open-mpi.org>
Cc: Matt Thompson <fort...@gmail.com<mailto:fort...@gmail.com>>
Subject: [OMPI users] Help with One-Sided Communication: Works in Intel MPI, 
Fails in Open MPI



All,



My guess is this is a "I built Open MPI incorrectly" sort of issue, but I'm not 
sure how to fix it. Namely, I'm currently trying to get an MPI project's CI 
working on CircleCI using Open MPI to run some unit tests (on a single node, so 
need some oversubscribe). I can build everything just fine, but when I try to 
run, things just...blow up:



[root@3796b115c961 build]# /opt/openmpi-4.0.2/bin/mpirun -np 18 -oversubscribe 
/root/project/MAPL/build/bin/pfio_ctest_io.x -nc 6 -nsi 6 -nso 6 -ngo 1 -ngi 1 
-v T,U -s mpi
 start app rank:           0
 start app rank:           1
 start app rank:           2
 start app rank:           3
 start app rank:           4
 start app rank:           5
[3796b115c961:03629] Read -1, expected 48, errno = 1
[3796b115c961:03629] *** An error occurred in MPI_Get
[3796b115c961:03629] *** reported by process [2144600065,12]
[3796b115c961:03629] *** on win rdma window 5
[3796b115c961:03629] *** MPI_ERR_OTHER: known error not in list
[3796b115c961:03629] *** MPI_ERRORS_ARE_FATAL (processes in this win will now 
abort,
[3796b115c961:03629] ***    and potentially your MPI job)



I'm currently more concerned about the MPI_Get error, though I'm not sure what 
that "Read -1, expected 48, errno = 1" bit is about (MPI-IO error?). Now this 
code is fairly fancy MPI code, so I decided to try a simpler one. Searched the 
internet and found an example program here:



https://software.intel.com/en-us/blogs/2014/08/06/one-sided-communication



and when I build and run with Intel MPI it works:



(1027)(master) $ mpirun -V
Intel(R) MPI Library for Linux* OS, Version 2018 Update 4 Build 20180823 (id: 
18555)
Copyright 2003-2018 Intel Corporation.

(1028)(master) $ mpiicc rma_test.c
(1029)(master) $ mpirun -np 2 ./a.out
srun.slurm: cluster configuration lacks support for cpu binding
Rank 0 running on borgj001
Rank 1 running on borgj001
Rank 0 sets data in the shared memory: 00 01 02 03
Rank 1 sets data in the shared memory: 10 11 12 13
Rank 0 gets data from the shared memory: 10 11 12 13
Rank 1 gets data from the shared memory: 00 01 02 03
Rank 0 has new data in the shared memory:Rank 1 has new data in the shared 
memory: 10 11 12 13
 00 01 02 03



So, I have some confidence it was written correctly. Now on the same system I 
try with Open MPI (building with gcc, not Intel C):



(1032)(master) $ mpirun -V
mpirun (Open MPI) 4.0.1

Report bugs to http://www.open-mpi.org/community/help/

(1033)(master) $ mpicc rma_test.c
(1034)(master) $ mpirun -np 2 ./a.out
Rank 0 running on borgj001
Rank 1 running on borgj001
Rank 0 sets data in the shared memory: 00 01 02 03
Rank 1 sets data in the shared memory: 10 11 12 13
[borgj001:22668] *** An error occurred in MPI_Get
[borgj001:22668] *** reported by process [2514223105,1]
[borgj001:22668] *** on win rdma window 3
[borgj001:22668] *** MPI_ERR_RMA_RANGE: invalid RMA address range
[borgj001:22668] *** MPI_ERRORS_ARE_FATAL (processes in this win will now abort,
[borgj001:22668] ***    and potentially your MPI job)
[borgj001:22642] 1 more process has sent help message help-mpi-errors.txt / 
mpi_errors_are_fatal
[borgj001:22642] Set MCA parameter "orte_base_help_aggregate" to 0 to see all 
help / error messages



This is a similar failure to above. Any ideas what I might be doing wrong here? 
I don't doubt I'm missing something, but I'm not sure what. Open MPI was built 
pretty boringly:



Configure command line: '--with-slurm' '--enable-shared' 
'--disable-wrapper-rpath' '--disable-wrapper-runpath' 
'--enable-mca-no-build=btl-usnic' '--prefix=...'



And I'm not sure if we need those disable-wrapper bits anymore, but long ago we 
needed them, and so they've lived on in "how to build" READMEs until something 
breaks. This btl-usnic is a bit unknown to me (this was built by sysadmins on a 
cluster), but this is pretty close to how I build on my desktop and it has the 
same issue.



Any ideas from the experts?



--

Matt Thompson

   “The fact is, this is about us identifying what we do best and

   finding more ways of doing less of it better” -- Director of Better Anna 
Rampton


--
Matt Thompson
   “The fact is, this is about us identifying what we do best and
   finding more ways of doing less of it better” -- Director of Better Anna 
Rampton

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 
contain
confidential information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution
is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the 
sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to