> On Mar 4, 2019, at 5:34 AM, Daniel Letai <d...@letai.org.il> wrote: > > Gilles, > On 3/4/19 8:28 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote: >> Daniel, >> >> >> On 3/4/2019 3:18 PM, Daniel Letai wrote: >>> >>>> So unless you have a specific reason not to mix both, you might also give >>>> the internal PMIx a try. >>> Does this hold true for libevent too? Configure complains if libevent for >>> openmpi is different than the one used for the other tools. >>> >> >> I am not exactly sure of which scenario you are running. >> >> Long story short, >> >> - If you use an external PMIx, then you have to use an external libevent >> (otherwise configure will fail). >> >> It must be the same one used by PMIx, but I am not sure configure checks >> that. >> >> - If you use the internal PMIx, then it is up to you. you can either use the >> internal libevent, or an external one. >> > Thanks, that clarifies the issues I've experienced. Since PMIx doesn't have > to be the same for server and nodes, I can compile slurm with external PMIx > with system libevent, and compile openmpi with internal PMIx and libevent, > and that should work. Is that correct?
Yes - that is indeed correct! > > BTW, building 4.0.1rc1 completed successfully using external for all, will > start testing in near future. >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> Gilles >> > Thanks, > Dani_L. >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> users@lists.open-mpi.org <mailto:users@lists.open-mpi.org> >> https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> <https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/users> > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@lists.open-mpi.org <mailto:users@lists.open-mpi.org> > https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/users > <https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.open-mpi.org https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/users
