Afraid I’m not familiar with that option, so I really don’t know :-( > On Jun 22, 2018, at 10:13 AM, Noam Bernstein <noam.bernst...@nrl.navy.mil> > wrote: > >> On Jun 22, 2018, at 1:00 PM, r...@open-mpi.org <mailto:r...@open-mpi.org> >> wrote: >> >> I suspect it is okay. Keep in mind that OMPI itself is starting multiple >> progress threads, so that is likely what you are seeing. The binding patter >> in the mpirun output looks correct as the default would be to map-by socket >> and you asked that we bind-to core. > > I agree that the mpirun output makes sense - I’m more worried about the PSR > field in the output of ps. Is it really consistent with what mpirun asked > for? > > > Noam > > > > ____________ > || > |U.S. NAVAL| > |_RESEARCH_| > LABORATORY > > Noam Bernstein, Ph.D. > Center for Materials Physics and Technology > U.S. Naval Research Laboratory > T +1 202 404 8628 F +1 202 404 7546 > https://www.nrl.navy.mil <https://www.nrl.navy.mil/> > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@lists.open-mpi.org > https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.open-mpi.org https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/users
