No, I don't have (or used where they were available) the Intel compiler. I used clang and gfortran. I can try on a Linux box with the Intel 2017 compilers.
George. On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Volker Blum <volker.b...@duke.edu> wrote: > Did you use Intel Fortran 2017 as well? > > (I’m asking because I did see the same issue with a combination of an > earlier Intel Fortran 2017 version and OpenMPI on an Intel/Infiniband Linux > HPC machine … but not Intel Fortran 2016 on the same machine. Perhaps I can > revive my access to that combination somehow.) > > Best wishes > Volker > > > On Jul 26, 2017, at 5:55 PM, George Bosilca <bosi...@icl.utk.edu> wrote: > > > > I thought that maybe the underlying allreduce algorithm fails to support > MPI_IN_PLACE correctly, but I can't replicate on any machine (including > OSX) with any number of processes. > > > > George. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Volker Blum <volker.b...@duke.edu> > wrote: > > Thanks! > > > > I tried ‘use mpi’, which compiles fine. > > > > Same result as with ‘include mpif.h', in that the output is > > > > * MPI_IN_PLACE does not appear to work as intended. > > * Checking whether MPI_ALLREDUCE works at all. > > * Without MPI_IN_PLACE, MPI_ALLREDUCE appears to work. > > > > Hm. Any other thoughts? > > > > Thanks again! > > Best wishes > > Volker > > > > > On Jul 26, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet < > gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Volker, > > > > > > With mpi_f08, you have to declare > > > > > > Type(MPI_Comm) :: mpi_comm_global > > > > > > (I am afk and not 100% sure of the syntax) > > > > > > A simpler option is to > > > > > > use mpi > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Gilles > > > > > > Volker Blum <volker.b...@duke.edu> wrote: > > >> Hi Gilles, > > >> > > >> Thank you very much for the response! > > >> > > >> Unfortunately, I don’t have access to a different system with the > issue right now. As I said, it’s not new; it just keeps creeping up > unexpectedly again on different platforms. What puzzles me is that I’ve > encountered the same problem with low but reasonable frequency over a > period of now over five years. > > >> > > >> We can’t require F’08 in our application, unfortunately, since this > standard is too new. Since we maintain a large application that has to run > on a broad range of platforms, Fortran 2008 would not work for many of our > users. In a few years, this will be different, but not yet. > > >> > > >> On gfortran: In our own tests, unfortunately, Intel Fortran > consistently produced much faster executable code in the past. The latter > observation may also change someday, but for us, the performance difference > was an important constraint. > > >> > > >> I did suspect mpif.h, too. Not sure how to best test this hypothesis, > however. > > >> > > >> Just replacing > > >> > > >>> include 'mpif.h' > > >>> with > > >>> use mpi_f08 > > >> > > >> did not work, for me. > > >> > > >> This produces a number of compilation errors: > > >> > > >> blum:/Users/blum/codes/fhi-aims/openmpi_test> mpif90 > check_mpi_in_place_08.f90 -o check_mpi_in_place_08.x > > >> check_mpi_in_place_08.f90(55): error #6303: The assignment operation > or the binary expression operation is invalid for the data types of the two > operands. [MPI_COMM_WORLD] > > >> mpi_comm_global = MPI_COMM_WORLD > > >> ----------------------^ > > >> check_mpi_in_place_08.f90(57): error #6285: There is no matching > specific subroutine for this generic subroutine call. [MPI_COMM_SIZE] > > >> call MPI_COMM_SIZE(mpi_comm_global, n_tasks, mpierr) > > >> ---------^ > > >> check_mpi_in_place_08.f90(58): error #6285: There is no matching > specific subroutine for this generic subroutine call. [MPI_COMM_RANK] > > >> call MPI_COMM_RANK(mpi_comm_global, myid, mpierr) > > >> ---------^ > > >> check_mpi_in_place_08.f90(75): error #6285: There is no matching > specific subroutine for this generic subroutine call. [MPI_ALLREDUCE] > > >> call MPI_ALLREDUCE(MPI_IN_PLACE, & > > >> ---------^ > > >> check_mpi_in_place_08.f90(94): error #6285: There is no matching > specific subroutine for this generic subroutine call. [MPI_ALLREDUCE] > > >> call MPI_ALLREDUCE(check_success, aux_check_success, 1, > MPI_LOGICAL, & > > >> ---------^ > > >> check_mpi_in_place_08.f90(119): error #6285: There is no matching > specific subroutine for this generic subroutine call. [MPI_ALLREDUCE] > > >> call MPI_ALLREDUCE(test_data(:), & > > >> ------------^ > > >> check_mpi_in_place_08.f90(140): error #6285: There is no matching > specific subroutine for this generic subroutine call. [MPI_ALLREDUCE] > > >> call MPI_ALLREDUCE(check_conventional_mpi, aux_check_success, > 1, MPI_LOGICAL, & > > >> ------------^ > > >> compilation aborted for check_mpi_in_place_08.f90 (code 1) > > >> > > >> This is an interesting result, however … what might I be missing? > Another use statement? > > >> > > >> Best wishes > > >> Volker > > >> > > >>> On Jul 26, 2017, at 2:53 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet < > gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Volker, > > >>> > > >>> thanks, i will have a look at it > > >>> > > >>> meanwhile, if you can reproduce this issue on a more mainstream > > >>> platform (e.g. linux + gfortran) please let me know. > > >>> > > >>> since you are using ifort, Open MPI was built with Fortran 2008 > > >>> bindings, so you can replace > > >>> include 'mpif.h' > > >>> with > > >>> use mpi_f08 > > >>> and who knows, that might solve your issue > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Cheers, > > >>> > > >>> Gilles > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Volker Blum <volker.b...@duke.edu> > wrote: > > >>>> Dear Gilles, > > >>>> > > >>>> Thank you very much for the fast answer. > > >>>> > > >>>> Darn. I feared it might not occur on all platforms, since my former > Macbook > > >>>> (with an older OpenMPI version) no longer exhibited the problem, a > different > > >>>> Linux/Intel Machine did last December, etc. > > >>>> > > >>>> On this specific machine, the configure line is > > >>>> > > >>>> ./configure CC=gcc FC=ifort F77=ifort > > >>>> > > >>>> ifort version 17.0.4 > > >>>> > > >>>> blum:/Users/blum/software/openmpi-3.0.0rc1> gcc -v > > >>>> Configured with: --prefix=/Applications/Xcode. > app/Contents/Developer/usr > > >>>> --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2.1 > > >>>> Apple LLVM version 8.1.0 (clang-802.0.42) > > >>>> Target: x86_64-apple-darwin16.6.0 > > >>>> Thread model: posix > > >>>> InstalledDir: > > >>>> /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/ > XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin > > >>>> > > >>>> The full test program is appended. > > >>>> > > >>>> Compilation: > > >>>> > > >>>> mpif90 check_mpi_in_place.f90 > > >>>> > > >>>> blum:/Users/blum/codes/fhi-aims/openmpi_test> which mpif90 > > >>>> /usr/local/openmpi-3.0.0rc1/bin/mpif90 > > >>>> > > >>>> blum:/Users/blum/codes/fhi-aims/openmpi_test> which mpirun > > >>>> /usr/local/openmpi-3.0.0rc1/bin/mpirun > > >>>> > > >>>> blum:/Users/blum/codes/fhi-aims/openmpi_test> mpirun -np 2 a.out > > >>>> * MPI_IN_PLACE does not appear to work as intended. > > >>>> * Checking whether MPI_ALLREDUCE works at all. > > >>>> * Without MPI_IN_PLACE, MPI_ALLREDUCE appears to work. > > >>>> > > >>>> blum:/Users/blum/codes/fhi-aims/openmpi_test> mpirun -np 1 a.out > > >>>> * MPI_IN_PLACE does not appear to work as intended. > > >>>> * Checking whether MPI_ALLREDUCE works at all. > > >>>> * Without MPI_IN_PLACE, MPI_ALLREDUCE appears to work. > > >>>> > > >>>> Hopefully, no trivial mistakes in the testcase. I just spent a few > days > > >>>> tracing this issue through a fairly large code, which is where the > issue > > >>>> originally arose (and leads to wrong numbers). > > >>>> > > >>>> Best wishes > > >>>> Volker > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>> On Jul 26, 2017, at 9:46 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet > > >>>>> <gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Volker, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> i was unable to reproduce this issue on linux > > >>>>> > > >>>>> can you please post your full configure command line, your gnu > > >>>>> compiler version and the full test program ? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> also, how many mpi tasks are you running ? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Gilles > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Volker Blum <volker.b...@duke.edu> > wrote: > > >>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I tried openmpi-3.0.0rc1.tar.gz using Intel Fortran 2017 and gcc > on a > > >>>>>> current MacOS system. For this version, it seems to me that > MPI_IN_PLACE > > >>>>>> returns incorrect results (while other MPI implementations, > including some > > >>>>>> past OpenMPI versions, work fine). > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> This can be seen with a simple Fortran example code, shown below. > In the > > >>>>>> test, the values of all entries of an array “test_data” should be > 1.0d0 if > > >>>>>> the behavior were as intended. However, the version of OpenMPI I > have > > >>>>>> returns 0.d0 instead. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I’ve seen this behavior on some other compute platforms too, in > the past, > > >>>>>> so it wasn’t new to me. Still, I thought that this time, I’d ask. > Any > > >>>>>> thoughts? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Thank you, > > >>>>>> Best wishes > > >>>>>> Volker > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> ! size of test data array > > >>>>>> integer :: n_data > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> ! array that contains test data for MPI_IN_PLACE > > >>>>>> real*8, allocatable :: test_data(:) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> integer :: mpierr > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> n_data = 10 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> allocate(test_data(n_data),stat=mpierr) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> ! seed test data array for allreduce call below > > >>>>>> if (myid.eq.0) then > > >>>>>> test_data(:) = 1.d0 > > >>>>>> else > > >>>>>> test_data(:) = 0.d0 > > >>>>>> end if > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> ! Sum the test_data array over all MPI tasks > > >>>>>> call MPI_ALLREDUCE(MPI_IN_PLACE, & > > >>>>>> test_data(:), & > > >>>>>> n_data, & > > >>>>>> MPI_DOUBLE_PRECISION, & > > >>>>>> MPI_SUM, & > > >>>>>> mpi_comm_global, & > > >>>>>> mpierr ) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> ! The value of all entries of test_data should now be 1.d0 on > all MPI > > >>>>>> tasks. > > >>>>>> ! If that is not the case, then the MPI_IN_PLACE flag may be > broken. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Volker Blum > > >>>>>> Associate Professor > > >>>>>> Ab Initio Materials Simulations > > >>>>>> Duke University, MEMS Department > > >>>>>> 144 Hudson Hall, Box 90300, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> volker.b...@duke.edu > > >>>>>> https://aims.pratt.duke.edu > > >>>>>> +1 (919) 660 5279 > > >>>>>> Twitter: Aimsduke > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Office: 1111 Hudson Hall > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > > >>>>>> users mailing list > > >>>>>> users@lists.open-mpi.org > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__rfd. > newmexicoconsortium.org_mailman_listinfo_users&d=DwIGaQ&c= > imBPVzF25OnBgGmVOlcsiEgHoG1i6YHLR0Sj_gZ4adc&r=I9QLPu689VeINkpRod6EQfprr_v- > FLoLsAuSXIHhDsk&m=QLtQXqnGSkgQnmgI4RxZXa9R6FhMmg > j2FLN452Q0Wis&s=BeracGkSHhIyI_bjKJqPHCqMuP-Se2pRmbiNfugkdK8&e= > > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > > >>>>> users mailing list > > >>>>> users@lists.open-mpi.org > > >>>>> > > >>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__rfd. > newmexicoconsortium.org_mailman_listinfo_users&d=DwIGaQ&c= > imBPVzF25OnBgGmVOlcsiEgHoG1i6YHLR0Sj_gZ4adc&r=I9QLPu689VeINkpRod6EQfprr_v- > FLoLsAuSXIHhDsk&m=QLtQXqnGSkgQnmgI4RxZXa9R6FhMmg > j2FLN452Q0Wis&s=BeracGkSHhIyI_bjKJqPHCqMuP-Se2pRmbiNfugkdK8&e= > > >>>> > > >>>> Volker Blum > > >>>> Associate Professor > > >>>> Ab Initio Materials Simulations > > >>>> Duke University, MEMS Department > > >>>> 144 Hudson Hall, Box 90300, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA > > >>>> > > >>>> volker.b...@duke.edu > > >>>> https://aims.pratt.duke.edu > > >>>> +1 (919) 660 5279 > > >>>> Twitter: Aimsduke > > >>>> > > >>>> Office: 1111 Hudson Hall > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> _______________________________________________ > > >>>> users mailing list > > >>>> users@lists.open-mpi.org > > >>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__rfd. > newmexicoconsortium.org_mailman_listinfo_users&d=DwIGaQ&c= > imBPVzF25OnBgGmVOlcsiEgHoG1i6YHLR0Sj_gZ4adc&r=I9QLPu689VeINkpRod6EQfprr_v- > FLoLsAuSXIHhDsk&m=e9pjil1vV3SDa40dQJww0p-d0LhgyQzX_kPNhmz-oUE&s= > Y4hrMiRzNuObkpm0vPojCqr6Cx6uS_wLxNyAfUaBz70&e= > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> users mailing list > > >>> users@lists.open-mpi.org > > >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__rfd. > newmexicoconsortium.org_mailman_listinfo_users&d=DwIGaQ&c= > imBPVzF25OnBgGmVOlcsiEgHoG1i6YHLR0Sj_gZ4adc&r=I9QLPu689VeINkpRod6EQfprr_v- > FLoLsAuSXIHhDsk&m=e9pjil1vV3SDa40dQJww0p-d0LhgyQzX_kPNhmz-oUE&s= > Y4hrMiRzNuObkpm0vPojCqr6Cx6uS_wLxNyAfUaBz70&e= > > >> > > >> Volker Blum > > >> Associate Professor > > >> Ab Initio Materials Simulations > > >> Duke University, MEMS Department > > >> 144 Hudson Hall, Box 90300, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA > > >> > > >> volker.b...@duke.edu > > >> https://aims.pratt.duke.edu > > >> +1 (919) 660 5279 > > >> Twitter: Aimsduke > > >> > > >> Office: 1111 Hudson Hall > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> users mailing list > > >> users@lists.open-mpi.org > > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__rfd. > newmexicoconsortium.org_mailman_listinfo_users&d=DwIGaQ&c= > imBPVzF25OnBgGmVOlcsiEgHoG1i6YHLR0Sj_gZ4adc&r=I9QLPu689VeINkpRod6EQfprr_v- > FLoLsAuSXIHhDsk&m=HDubxzHgm3hz7-NQfgobz7rkGf0LWBTlGGqdgSoPCC4& > s=2D1Arirt92pKR6i2-4KQKZ8YhSnZ2TPkouQQePHvNf0&e= > > > _______________________________________________ > > > users mailing list > > > users@lists.open-mpi.org > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__rfd. > newmexicoconsortium.org_mailman_listinfo_users&d=DwIGaQ&c= > imBPVzF25OnBgGmVOlcsiEgHoG1i6YHLR0Sj_gZ4adc&r=I9QLPu689VeINkpRod6EQfprr_v- > FLoLsAuSXIHhDsk&m=HDubxzHgm3hz7-NQfgobz7rkGf0LWBTlGGqdgSoPCC4& > s=2D1Arirt92pKR6i2-4KQKZ8YhSnZ2TPkouQQePHvNf0&e= > > > > Volker Blum > > Associate Professor > > Ab Initio Materials Simulations > > Duke University, MEMS Department > > 144 Hudson Hall, Box 90300, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA > > > > volker.b...@duke.edu > > https://aims.pratt.duke.edu > > +1 (919) 660 5279 > > Twitter: Aimsduke > > > > Office: 1111 Hudson Hall > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users@lists.open-mpi.org > > https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users@lists.open-mpi.org > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__rfd. > newmexicoconsortium.org_mailman_listinfo_users&d=DwICAg&c= > imBPVzF25OnBgGmVOlcsiEgHoG1i6YHLR0Sj_gZ4adc&r=I9QLPu689VeINkpRod6EQfprr_v- > FLoLsAuSXIHhDsk&m=4W_1_DI3QU9PRT2fhTXyUeXiu7HvTSNzX48E-9ifoTc&s= > i3f7Olcbyor4Pu0hv6YlgO10cJ_XvOR13zZn7PPIGto&e= > > Volker Blum > Associate Professor > Ab Initio Materials Simulations > Duke University, MEMS Department > 144 Hudson Hall, Box 90300, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA > > volker.b...@duke.edu > https://aims.pratt.duke.edu > +1 (919) 660 5279 > Twitter: Aimsduke > > Office: 1111 Hudson Hall > > > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@lists.open-mpi.org > https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users >
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users
