Hi Jeff, The same problem is seen with OpenMPI v2.1.0 too.
Thanks, -Harsha On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: > Can you try the latest version of Open MPI? There have been bug fixes in the > MPI one-sided area. > > Try Open MPI v2.1.0, or v2.0.2 if you want to stick with the v2.0.x series. > I think there have been some post-release one-sided fixes, too -- you may > also want to try nightly snapshots on both of those branches. > >> On Apr 13, 2017, at 6:48 AM, Sriharsha Basavapatna via users >> <users@lists.open-mpi.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm seeing an issue with Openmpi Version 2.0.1. The setup uses 2 nodes >> with 1 process on each node and the test case is P_Write_Indv. The problem >> occurs when the test runs 4MB byte size and the mode is NON-AGGREGATE. >> The test just hangs at that point. Here's the exact command/options that's >> being used, followed by the output log and the stack trace (with gdb): >> >> # /usr/local/mpi/openmpi/bin/mpirun -np 2 -hostfile hostfile -mca btl >> self,sm,open ib -mca btl_openib_receive_queues P,65536,256,192,128 -mca >> btl_openib_cpc_include rdmacm -mca orte_base_help_aggregate 0 >> --allow-run-as-root --bind-to none --map-by node >> /usr/local/imb/openmpi/IMB-IO -msglog 21:22 -include P_Write_Indv -time 300 >> >> #----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> # Benchmarking P_Write_Indv >> # #processes = 1 >> # ( 1 additional process waiting in MPI_Barrier) >> #----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> # >> # MODE: AGGREGATE >> # >> #bytes #repetitions t_min[usec] t_max[usec] t_avg[usec] Mbytes/sec >> 0 1000 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.00 >> 2097152 20 31662.31 31662.31 31662.31 63.17 >> 4194304 10 64159.89 64159.89 64159.89 62.34 >> >> #----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> # Benchmarking P_Write_Indv >> # #processes = 1 >> # ( 1 additional process waiting in MPI_Barrier) >> #----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> # >> # MODE: NON-AGGREGATE >> # >> #bytes #repetitions t_min[usec] t_max[usec] t_avg[usec] Mbytes/sec >> 0 100 570.14 570.14 570.14 0.00 >> 2097152 20 55007.33 55007.33 55007.33 36.36 >> 4194304 10 85838.17 85838.17 85838.17 46.60 >> >> >> #1 0x00007f08bf5af2a3 in poll_device () from >> /usr/local/mpi/openmpi/lib/libopen-pal.so.20 >> #2 0x00007f08bf5afe15 in btl_openib_component_progress () >> from /usr/local/mpi/openmpi/lib/libopen-pal.so.20 >> #3 0x00007f08bf55b89c in opal_progress () from >> /usr/local/mpi/openmpi/lib/libopen-pal.so.20 >> #4 0x00007f08c0294a55 in ompi_request_default_wait_all () >> from /usr/local/mpi/openmpi/lib/libmpi.so.20 >> #5 0x00007f08c02da295 in ompi_coll_base_allreduce_intra_recursivedoubling () >> from /usr/local/mpi/openmpi/lib/libmpi.so.20 >> #6 0x00007f08c034b399 in mca_io_ompio_set_view_internal () >> from /usr/local/mpi/openmpi/lib/libmpi.so.20 >> #7 0x00007f08c034b76c in mca_io_ompio_file_set_view () >> from /usr/local/mpi/openmpi/lib/libmpi.so.20 >> #8 0x00007f08c02cc00f in PMPI_File_set_view () from >> /usr/local/mpi/openmpi/lib/libmpi.so.20 >> #9 0x000000000040e4fd in IMB_init_transfer () >> #10 0x0000000000405f5c in IMB_init_buffers_iter () >> #11 0x0000000000402d25 in main () >> (gdb) >> >> >> I did some analysis, please see the details below: >> >> The mpi threads on the Root-node and the Peer-node are hung trying to >> get completions on the RQ and SQ. There are no new completions as per the >> data in the RQ/SQ and corresponding CQs in the device. Here's the sequence >> as per the queue status observed in the device (while the thread is stuck >> waiting for new completions): >> >> Root-node (RQ) Peer-node (SQ) >> >> >> 0 <---------------------------0 >> ................. >> ................. >> 17 SEND-Inline WRs >> (17 RQ-CQEs seen) >> ................ >> ................ >> 16 <----------------------------16 >> >> >> >> 17<----------------------------- 17 >> 1 RDMA-WRITE-Inline+Signaled >> (1 SQ-CQE generated) >> >> >> 18 <-----------------------------18 >> ................. >> ................. >> 19 RDMA-WRITE-Inlines >> ................ >> ................ >> 36 <----------------------------36 >> >> >> Like shown in the above diagram here's the sequence of events (Work >> Requests and Completions) that occurred between the Root node and the >> Peer node. >> >> 1) Peer node posts 17 Send WRs with Inline flag set >> 2) Root node receives all these 17 pkts in its RQ >> 3) 17 CQEs are generated in the Root node in its RCQ >> 4) Peer node posts an RDMA-WRITE WR with Inline and Signaled flag bits set >> 5) Operation completes on the SQ and a CQE is generated in the SCQ >> 6) There's no CQE on the Root node since it is an RDMA-WRITE operation >> 7) Peer node posts 19 RDMA-WRITE WRs with Inline flag, but no Signaled flag >> 8) No CQEs on the Peer node, since they are not Signaled >> 9) No CQEs on the Root node, since they are RDMA-WRITEs >> >> At this point, the Root node is polling on its RCQ for new completions >> and there aren't any, since all SENDs are already received and CQEs seen. >> >> Similarly, the Peer node is polling on its SCQ for new completions >> and there aren't any, since the 19 RDMA-WRITEs are not signaled. >> >> There is an exact similar condition in the reverse direction too. >> That is, Root node issues a bunch of SENDs to the Peer node, followed >> by some RDMA-WRITEs. The Peer node gets CQEs for the SENDs and looks >> for more CQEs but there won't be any, since the subsequent ones are >> all RDMA-WRITEs. The Root node itself is polling on its SCQ and it won't >> find any new completions since there are no more signaled WRs. >> >> So the 2 nodes are now in a hung state, polling on both the SCQ and RCQ, >> while there's no such operations pending that can generate new CQEs. >> >> Thanks, >> -Harsha >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> users@lists.open-mpi.org >> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquy...@cisco.com > _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users