Can this help? If you think any other information could be relevant, let me
know.

Cheers,
Ángel

cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
cpu             : PPC970MP, altivec supported
clock           : 2297.700000MHz
revision        : 1.1 (pvr 0044 0101)

[4 processors]

timebase        : 14318000
machine         : CHRP IBM,8844-Z0C

uname -a
Linux login1 2.6.16.60-perfctr-0.42.4-ppc64 #1 SMP Fri Aug 21 15:25:15 CEST
2009 ppc64 ppc64 ppc64 GNU/Linux

lsb_release -a
Distributor ID: SUSE LINUX
Description:    SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 (ppc)
Release:        10


On 9 March 2017 at 15:04, Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr> wrote:

> What's this machine made of? (processor, etc)
> What kernel are you running ?
>
> Getting no "socket" or "package" at all is quite rare these days.
>
> Brice
>
>
>
>
> Le 09/03/2017 15:28, Angel de Vicente a écrit :
> > Hi again,
> >
> > thanks for your help. I installed the latest OpenMPI (2.0.2).
> >
> > lstopo output:
> >
> > ,----
> > | lstopo --version
> > | lstopo 1.11.2
> > |
> > | lstopo
> > | Machine (7861MB)
> > |   L2 L#0 (1024KB) + L1d L#0 (32KB) + L1i L#0 (64KB) + Core L#0 + PU L#0
> > |   (P#0)
> > |   L2 L#1 (1024KB) + L1d L#1 (32KB) + L1i L#1 (64KB) + Core L#1 + PU L#1
> > |   (P#1)
> > |   L2 L#2 (1024KB) + L1d L#2 (32KB) + L1i L#2 (64KB) + Core L#2 + PU L#2
> > |   (P#2)
> > |   L2 L#3 (1024KB) + L1d L#3 (32KB) + L1i L#3 (64KB) + Core L#3 + PU L#3
> > |   (P#3)
> > |   HostBridge L#0
> > |     PCIBridge
> > |       PCI 1014:028c
> > |         Block L#0 "sda"
> > |       PCI 14c1:8043
> > |         Net L#1 "myri0"
> > |     PCIBridge
> > |       PCI 14e4:166b
> > |         Net L#2 "eth0"
> > |       PCI 14e4:166b
> > |         Net L#3 "eth1"
> > |     PCIBridge
> > |       PCI 1002:515e
> > `----
> >
> > I started with GCC 6.3.0, compiled OpenMPI 2.0.2 with it, and then HDF5
> > 1.10.0-patch1 with it. Our code then compiles OK with it, and it runs OK
> > without "mpirun":
> >
> > ,----
> > | ./mancha3D
> > |                                     __                  __    _____
> > |    /'\_/`\                         /\ \               /'__`\ /\  _ `\
> > |   /\      \     __      ___     ___\ \ \___      __  /\_\L\ \\ \ \/\ \
> > |   \ \ \__\ \  /'__`\  /' _ `\  /'___\ \  _ `\  /'__`\\/_/_\_<_\ \ \ \ \
> > |    \ \ \_/\ \/\ \L\.\_/\ \/\ \/\ \__/\ \ \ \ \/\ \L\.\_/\ \L\ \\ \ \_\
> \
> > |     \ \_\\ \_\ \__/.\_\ \_\ \_\ \____\\ \_\ \_\ \__/.\_\ \____/ \
> \____/
> > |      \/_/ \/_/\/__/\/_/\/_/\/_/\/____/ \/_/\/_/\/__/\/_/\/___/   \/___/
> > |
> > |  ./mancha3D should be given the name of a control file as argument.
> > `----
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > But it complains as before when run with mpirun
> >
> > ,----
> > | mpirun --map-by socket --bind-to socket -np 1 ./mancha3D
> > | ------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> > | No objects of the specified type were found on at least one node:
> > |
> > |   Type: Package
> > |   Node: login1
> > |
> > | The map cannot be done as specified.
> > | ------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> > `----
> >
> >
> > If I submit it directly with srun, then the code runs, but not in
> > parallel, and two individual copies of the code are started:
> >
> > ,----
> > | srun -n 2 ./mancha3D
> > |                                     __                  __    _____
> > |    /'\_/`\                         /\ \               /'__`\ /\  _ `\
> > |   /\      \     __      ___     ___\ \ \___      __  /\_\L\ \\ \ \/\ \
> > |   \ \ \__\ \  /'__`\  /' _ `\  /'___\ \  _ `\  /'__`\\/_/_\_<_\ \ \ \ \
> > |    \ \ \_/\ \/\ \L\.\_/\ \/\ \/\ \__/\ \ \ \ \/\ \L\.\_/\ \L\ \\ \ \_\
> \
> > |     \ \_\\ \_\ \__/.\_\ \_\ \_\ \____\\ \_\ \_\ \__/.\_\ \____/ \
> \____/
> > |      \/_/ \/_/\/__/\/_/\/_/\/_/\/____/ \/_/\/_/\/__/\/_/\/___/   \/___/
> > |
> > |  should be given the name of a control file as argument.
> > |                                     __                  __    _____
> > |    /'\_/`\                         /\ \               /'__`\ /\  _ `\
> > |   /\      \     __      ___     ___\ \ \___      __  /\_\L\ \\ \ \/\ \
> > |   \ \ \__\ \  /'__`\  /' _ `\  /'___\ \  _ `\  /'__`\\/_/_\_<_\ \ \ \ \
> > |    \ \ \_/\ \/\ \L\.\_/\ \/\ \/\ \__/\ \ \ \ \/\ \L\.\_/\ \L\ \\ \ \_\
> \
> > |     \ \_\\ \_\ \__/.\_\ \_\ \_\ \____\\ \_\ \_\ \__/.\_\ \____/ \
> \____/
> > |      \/_/ \/_/\/__/\/_/\/_/\/_/\/____/ \/_/\/_/\/__/\/_/\/___/   \/___/
> > |
> > |  should be  given the name of a control file as argument.
> > `----
> >
> >
> >
> > Any ideas are welcome. Many thanks,
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@lists.open-mpi.org
> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.open-mpi.org
https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to