I am also a proponent of the multiple thread support. For many reasons: - code simplification - easier support of computation/communication overlap with fewer synchronization points - possibility of creating exception aware MPI Code (I think the MPI standard cruelly lacks constructs for a natural clean handling of application exceptions across processes)
So it is good to hear there is progress. On Feb 18, 2017 7:43 AM, "r...@open-mpi.org" <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote: > We have been making a concerted effort to resolve outstanding issues as > the interest in threaded applications has grown. It should be pretty good > now, but we do see occasional bug reports, so it isn’t perfect. > > > On Feb 18, 2017, at 12:14 AM, Mark Dixon <m.c.di...@leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, r...@open-mpi.org wrote: > > > >> Depends on the version, but if you are using something in the v2.x > range, you should be okay with just one installed version > > > > Thanks Ralph. > > > > How good is MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE support these days and how far up the > wishlist is it, please? > > > > We don't get many openmpi-specific queries from users but, other than > core binding, it seems to be the thing we get asked about the most (I > normally point those people at mvapich2 or intelmpi instead). > > > > Cheers, > > > > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users@lists.open-mpi.org > > https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@lists.open-mpi.org > https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users
