Not exactly, just want to confirm before we try them together. Thanks for
the answer.

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:

> There shouldn’t be any issue, nor anything required to make it work. Are
> you hitting a problem?
>
> On Jul 8, 2016, at 12:22 PM, Gang Chen <gchengor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Are they supposed to work together? Is there any change done in OpenMPI in
> order to support LSF 9.1.3 and 10.1?
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>
>> I’m sure IBM is doing so, but nothing that has been publicly disclosed on
>> the mailing list.
>>
>> > On Jul 8, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Gang Chen <gchengor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I am wondering if there's integration test conducted with v1.8.8 and
>> IBM LSF 9.1.3 or 10.1, especially the cpu affinity parts. Is there
>> somewhere I can find detail info?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Gordon
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > users mailing list
>> > us...@open-mpi.org
>> > Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> > Link to this post:
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2016/07/29621.php
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> Link to this post:
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2016/07/29622.php
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2016/07/29623.php
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2016/07/29624.php
>

Reply via email to