Hello Sreenidhi,
In our testing, we cannot use Mellanox OFED for compliance reasons. So, we use regular OFED. We test both Mellanox and Intel DUTs (NICs, switches, gateways, etc). I thank you. -- Llolsten From: users [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Sreenidhi Bharathkar Ramesh Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 5:30 AM To: Open MPI Users <us...@open-mpi.org> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Big jump from OFED 1.5.4.1 -> recent (stable). Any suggestions? hi Mehmet / Llolsten / Peter, Just curious to know what is the NIC or fabric you are using in your respective clusters. If it is Mellanox, is it not better to use the MLNX_OFED ? This information may help us build our cluster. Hence, asking. Thanks, - Sreenidhi. On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Peter Kjellström <c...@nsc.liu.se <mailto:c...@nsc.liu.se> > wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 13:18:33 -0400 "Llolsten Kaonga" <l...@soft-forge.com <mailto:l...@soft-forge.com> > wrote: > Hello Grigory, > > I am not sure what Redhat does exactly but when you install the OS, > there is always an InfiniBand Support module during the installation > process. We never check/install that module when we do OS > installations because it is usually several versions of OFED behind > (almost obsolete). It's not as bad as you assume. Also as I said before it's not an OFED version at all. We (and many other medium+ HPC centers) run the redhat stack for reason that it is 1) good enough 2) not an extra complication for the system environment. /Peter K (with ~3000 hpc nodes on rhel-ib for many years) _______________________________________________ users mailing list us...@open-mpi.org <mailto:us...@open-mpi.org> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users Link to this post: http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2016/06/29449.php
