On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Dave Love <d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk> wrote:

> ...
> Anyhow, the lesson seems to be that you shouldn't use mpi_wtime if you
> need decent precision or realistic mpi_wtick across implementations.
>
> I certainly hope that this isn't the lesson anyone learns from this.  It
is extremely important to application developers that MPI_Wtime represent a
"best effort" implementation on every platform.

Other implementations of MPI have very accurate counters.

Jeff

-- 
Jeff Hammond
jeff.scie...@gmail.com
http://jeffhammond.github.io/

Reply via email to