On Tuesday, February 2, 2016, Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr> wrote:
> Le 02/02/2016 15:21, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit : > > On Feb 2, 2016, at 9:00 AM, Dave Love <d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> Now that MX support has been dropped, is there an alternative for fast > Ethernet? > > There are several options for low latency ethernet, but they're all > vendor-based solutions (e.g., my company's usNIC solution). > > > > Note that MX support was dropped mainly due to lack of someone to > maintain it. If someone wants to step up to maintain the MX support (which > may potentially including maintaining the kernel side of things -- I don't > know if Brice is interested in maintaining it any longer), it could be > brought back. > > > > I announced the end of the Open-MX maintenance to my users in December > because OMPI was dropping MX support. Nobody complained. So I don't plan > to bring back Open-MX to life neither OMPI MX support. > > How much would it cost to turn Open-MX into a libfabric Ethernet provider? I'll pass the hat at SC16... Jeff > Brice > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org <javascript:;> > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users > Link to this post: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2016/02/28438.php > -- Jeff Hammond jeff.scie...@gmail.com http://jeffhammond.github.io/
