[Another old one.] Nick Papior <nickpap...@gmail.com> writes:
> Sure, I guess you should use numa to check how the latency/distance is for > the other processors to not select a _bad_ node? > I am not sure. > I can see difficulties in my above post for huge numa nodes, but for 8-10 > cores per socket it is pretty good. But it is easy to use ;) Actually, it isn't easy to use, in general. If you allow sharing of nodes, you'll need to schedule to sockets specifically, which your batch system must support. SGE, specifically, doesn't, as it hasn't seemed worth it, but it is OK binding to cores.
