@Jeff, Kevin Shouldn't Kevin wait for 1.10.1 with the intel 16 compiler? A bugfix for intel 16 has been committed with fb49a2d71ed9115be892e8a22643d9a1c069a8f9. (At least I am anxiously awaiting the 1.10.1 because I cannot get my builds to complete successfully)
2015-10-16 19:33 GMT+00:00 Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com>: > > On Oct 16, 2015, at 3:25 PM, McGrattan, Kevin B. Dr. < > kevin.mcgrat...@nist.gov> wrote: > > > > I cannot nail this down any better because this happens like every other > night, with about 1 out of a hundred jobs. Can anyone think of a reason why > the job would seg fault in MPI_FINALIZE, but only under conditions where > the jobs are tightly packed onto our cluster? > > There have been a bunch of fixes in the ORTE / MPI_FINALIZE areas of Open > MPI since 1.8.4. > > Is there any chance you can upgrade to 1.8.8, or, better yet, 1.10.0? > (note that even though it's 1.10, it's actually effectively a continuation > of the v1.8 series -- the v1.10 series does not represent a new fork from > our development master -- see the full version/roadmap details here, if > you're interested: > http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/open-mpi-new-versioning-scheme-and-roadmap > ). > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquy...@cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users > Link to this post: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2015/10/27887.php > -- Kind regards Nick
