Well, it looks like the formatting on that mail did not translate well. Sorry about that -- but at least it gives you an idea of what the new text looks like.
It will render better in a browser than it did in that email. :-) > On Jul 2, 2015, at 1:05 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com> > wrote: > > On Jul 2, 2015, at 12:20 PM, Tom Coles <tco...@mit.edu> wrote: >> >> I see, thanks for the quick reply. >> >> In light of this, I'd like to suggest an update to the FAQ entry at >> http://www.open-mpi.org/faq/?category=tuning#available-mca-params >> I just noticed that this is covered in question 6, but it is not clear when >> reading question 8. > > Thanks for the pointer. > > I actually started freshening the FAQ data (including topics like this) a few > weeks ago, but haven't finished it yet -- it's a low priority-edit kind of > thing; I do it while waiting for lengthy compiles, etc. Here's what the new > question 8 looks like (it's now question 9): > > 9. How do I know what MCA parameters are available? > > The ompi_info command can list the parameters for a given component, all the > parameters for a specific framework, or all parameters. Most parameters > contain a description of the parameter; all will show the parameter's current > value. [snip] -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
