On Jun 8, 2015, at 11:27 AM, Dave Goodell (dgoodell) <dgood...@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> My suggestion is to try to create a small reproducer program that we can send 
> to the GCC folks with the claim that we believe it to be a buggy 
> optimization.  Then we can see whether they agree and if not, how they defend 
> that behavior.
> 
> We probably still need a workaround for now though, and the "volatile" 
> approach seems fine to me.

+1

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

Reply via email to