On Jun 8, 2015, at 11:27 AM, Dave Goodell (dgoodell) <dgood...@cisco.com> wrote: > > My suggestion is to try to create a small reproducer program that we can send > to the GCC folks with the claim that we believe it to be a buggy > optimization. Then we can see whether they agree and if not, how they defend > that behavior. > > We probably still need a workaround for now though, and the "volatile" > approach seems fine to me.
+1 -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/