Le 15/12/2014 16:39, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit :
> The only real question is: will upgrading hwloc break anything else inside 
> the v1.8 tree?  E.g., did new hwloc abstractions/APIs come in after v1.7 that 
> we've adapted to on the trunk, but didn't adapt to on the v1.8 branch?

I wouldn't expect any such problem when upgrading from hwloc 1.7 to 1.9.

Brice


>
>
>
> On Dec 15, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, I should have been clearer - that was indeed what I was expecting to 
>> see. I guess it begs the question - should we just update to something like 
>> 1.9 so Brice doesn't have to worry about back porting future fixes this far 
>> back?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 
>> <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
>> FWIW, if it would be easier, we can just pull a new hwloc tarball -- that's 
>> how we've done it in the past (vs. trying to pull individual patches).  It's 
>> also easier to pull a release tarball, because then we can say "hwloc vX.Y.Z 
>> is in OMPI vA.B.C", rather than have to try to examine/explain what exact 
>> level of hwloc is in OMPI (based on patches, etc.).
>>
>>
>> On Dec 15, 2014, at 4:39 AM, Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr> wrote:
>>
>>> Le 15/12/2014 10:35, Jorge D'Elia a écrit :
>>>> Hi Brice,
>>>>
>>>> ----- Mensaje original -----
>>>>> De: "Brice Goglin" <brice.gog...@inria.fr>
>>>>> CC: "Open MPI Users" <us...@open-mpi.org>
>>>>> Enviado: Jueves, 11 de Diciembre 2014 19:46:44
>>>>> Asunto: Re: [OMPI users] OpenMPI 1.8.4 and hwloc in Fedora 14 using a 
>>>>> beta gcc 5.0 compiler.
>>>>>
>>>>> This problem was fixed in hwloc upstream recently.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/open-mpi/hwloc/commit/790aa2e1e62be6b4f37622959de9ce3766ebc57e
>>>> Great! However, yesterday I downloaded the versions 1.8.3 (stable) and
>>>> 1.8.4rc3 of OpenMPI, and tried to use its more traditional configuration.
>>>> It was OK on ia64 (as before) but failed again on ia32.  Then again,
>>>> I had to use the external installation of hwloc in order to fix it.
>>>>
>>> It's fixed in "upstream hwloc", not in OMPI yet. I have prepared a long
>>> branch of hwloc fixes that OMPI should pull, but it will take some time.
>>> thanks
>>> Brice
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>> Link to this post: 
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2014/12/25995.php
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Squyres
>> jsquy...@cisco.com
>> For corporate legal information go to: 
>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> Link to this post: 
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2014/12/25996.php
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> Link to this post: 
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2014/12/25998.php
>

Reply via email to