It's my fault - as release manager, I should have spotted that component sneaking into the release branch back in the 1.7 series, but I missed it. I have deleted it now as it was never intended to be released.
Sorry for the confusion. Ralph On May 15, 2014, at 8:33 PM, Hadi Montakhabi <hadi.montakh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ralph is right. > I used 1.8, and after digging into it, I noticed it doesn't even compile the > pmi component. When I tried to configure without orte, I could see the errors > while compiling. > It looks like it is well broken! > > Peace, > Hadi > > On May 15, 2014 7:28 PM, "Ralph Castain" <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote: > Josh - he's talking about the PMI component in ompi/mca/rte. It generally > doesn't work. > > > On May 15, 2014, at 5:15 PM, Joshua Ladd <jladd.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hadi, >> >> Is your job launching and executing normally? During the launch, frameworks >> are initialized by opening all components, selecting the desired one, and >> closing the others. I think you're just seeing components being opened, >> queried, and ultimately closed. The important thing is knowing if PMI was >> selected. Set: -mca ess_base_verbose 5 -mca plm_base_verbose 5 -mca >> grpcomm_base_verbose 5. >> >> Josh >> >> >> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote: >> I wouldn't trust that PMI component in the RTE framework - it was only >> created as a test example for that framework. It is routinely broken and not >> maintained, and can only be used if forced. >> >> Is this on the trunk? Or are you using the 1.8 series? If the latter, that >> component shouldn't even be there. >> >> >> On May 15, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Hadi Montakhabi <hadi.montakh...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> By "goes through orte component", I meant it does go into rte_orte_open >>> function in rte_orte_component.c. >>> Let me try to formulate my question in a different way: >>> There are two components in the rte framework, namely orte and pmi. >>> The question is whether pmi could be used independent from orte? Or it >>> needs orte to function? >>> >>> Peace, >>> Hadi >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote: >>> What do you mean "goes through orte component"? It will still call into the >>> orte code base, but will use PMI to do the modex. >>> >>> On May 15, 2014, at 12:54 PM, Hadi Montakhabi <hadi.montakh...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I am trying to utilize pmi instead of orte, but I come across the >>>> following problem. >>>> I do configure using --with-slurm=[slurm installation path] and >>>> --with-pmi=[slurm installation path]. >>>> >>>> After compiling, I run the executable using: >>>> $srun -n 2 --mpi=pmi2 ./executable >>>> >>>> However, this still goes through orte component, not the pmi. >>>> Am I missing something when I configure? >>>> >>>> Peace, >>>> Hadi >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> users mailing list >>>> us...@open-mpi.org >>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> users mailing list >>> us...@open-mpi.org >>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> users mailing list >>> us...@open-mpi.org >>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> us...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> us...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
