On May 14, 2014, at 3:21 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
> On May 14, 2014, at 6:09 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote: > >> FWIW: I believe we no longer build the slurm support by default, though I'd >> have to check to be sure. The intent is definitely not to do so. > > The srun-based support builds by default. I like it that way. :-) Yeah, because you actually use Slurm - but that isn't much comfort to all those who don't, but still get a slurm module. > > PMI-based support is a different animal, right? Yes, it is. > >> The plan we adjusted to a while back was to *only* build support for >> schedulers upon request. Can't swear that they are all correctly updated, >> but that was the intent. > > Why would we do that? I'm all for a minimal ./configure line... did I miss > something? As per my other note, we are getting a continually increasing number of "default" builds due to included files in the distro when there is zero intent to actually install/use the scheduler. > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquy...@cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
