Not really - it's the responsibility of the developer to file the CMR. Some 
folks are good about it, and some aren't. In this case, however, I suspect it 
didn't happen because we didn't hear back that the patch fixed the problem and 
was therefore correct  :-/


On Apr 10, 2014, at 8:02 AM, Richard Shaw <jr...@cita.utoronto.ca> wrote:

> Okay. Thanks for having a look Ralph!
> 
> For future reference, is there a better process I can go through if I find 
> bugs like this that makes sure they don't get forgotten?
> 
> Thanks,
> Richard
> 
> 
> On 10 April 2014 00:39, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
> Wow - that's an ancient one. I'll see if it can be applied to 1.8.1. These 
> things don't automatically go across - it requires that someone file a 
> request to move it - and I think this commit came into the trunk after we 
> branched for the 1.7 series.
> 
> 
> On Apr 9, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Richard Shaw <jr...@cita.utoronto.ca> wrote:
> 
>> I'm not sure I ever replied to this to say that the patch works perfectly 
>> (very belatedly)!
>> 
>> However I just wanted to ask what the progress of getting this into a 
>> released version is? I'm not particularly sure on the details on the OpenMPI 
>> development process - I've noticed that it's still in the SVN trunk, but 
>> hasn't made it into any of the intervening releases (neither stables 1.6.2-, 
>> 1.8; nor feature releases 1.7 onwards). Will this end up in the 1.9 series?
>> 
>> Richard
>> 
>> 
>> On 24 July 2012 19:02, Richard Shaw <jr...@cita.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>> Thanks George, I'm glad it wasn't just me being crazy. I'll try and test 
>> that one soon.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Richard
>> 
>> On Tuesday, 24 July, 2012 at 6:28 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
>> 
>>> Richard,
>>> 
>>> Thanks for identifying this issue and for the short example. I can confirm 
>>> your original understanding was right, the upper bound should be identical 
>>> on all ranks. I just pushed a patch (r26862), let me know if this fixes 
>>> your issue.
>>> 
>>>   Thanks,
>>>     george.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users

Reply via email to