Sorry -- we've been focusing on 1.7.5 and the impending 1.8 release; I probably 
won't be able to look at the v1.6 version in the next 2 weeks or so.


On Mar 25, 2014, at 9:09 AM, Edgar Gabriel <gabr...@cs.uh.edu> wrote:

> yes, the patch has been submitted to the 1.6 branch for review, not sure
> what the precise status of it is. The problems found are more or less
> independent of the PVFS2 version.
> 
> Thanks
> Edga
> 
> On 3/25/2014 7:32 AM, Dave Love wrote:
>> Edgar Gabriel <gabr...@cs.uh.edu> writes:
>> 
>>> I am still looking into the PVFS2 with ROMIO problem with the 1.6
>>> series, where (as I mentioned yesterday) the problem I am having right
>>> now is that the data is wrong. Not sure what causes it, but since I have
>>> teach this afternoon again, it might be friday until I can digg into that.
>> 
>> Was there any progress with this?  Otherwise, what version of PVFS2 is
>> known to work with OMPI 1.6?  Thanks.
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Edgar Gabriel
> Associate Professor
> Parallel Software Technologies Lab      http://pstl.cs.uh.edu
> Department of Computer Science          University of Houston
> Philip G. Hoffman Hall, Room 524        Houston, TX-77204, USA
> Tel: +1 (713) 743-3857                  Fax: +1 (713) 743-3335
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

Reply via email to