Looks good - thanks!

On Mar 24, 2014, at 4:55 AM, tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp wrote:

> 
> Hi Ralph,
> 
> I tried to improve checking for mapping-too-low and fixed a minor
> problem in rmaps_rr.c file. Please see attached patch file.
> 
> 1) Regarding mapping-too-low, in future we'll have a lager size of
> l1,2,3cache or other architectuers, and in that case, the needs to
> map by a lower object level will increase. So, it's better/exact to
> compare cpus_per_rank with ncpus of the mapping object in detecting
> it. How do you think?
> 
> 2) When orte_rmaps_rr_byobj returns with ORTE_ERR_NOT_FOUND,
> we should change mapping policy to ORTE_MAPPING_BYSLOT
> so that binding direction can be exactly evaluated in
> rmaps_base_binding.c file.
> 
> Tetsuya
> 
> (See attached file: 
> patch.rmaps)<patch.rmaps>_______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users

Reply via email to