Your fix worked for me, thanks.

By the way, I noticed that "bind-to obj" is forcibly override by "bind-to 
core", when pe=N is specified.
This is just my opinion, but I think it's too conservative and a kind of 
regression from the openmpi-1.6.5. For example, "-map-by slot:pe=N -bind-to 
numa" looks 
acceptable to me. Your round_robin_mapper is now robust enough to handle it. 
The patch below would be better.  Please give it a try.

--- orte/mca/rmaps/base/rmaps_base_frame.c.org  2014-02-11 17:34:36.000000000 
+0900
+++ orte/mca/rmaps/base/rmaps_base_frame.c      2014-02-12 11:01:42.000000000 
+0900
@@ -393,13 +393,13 @@
          * bind to those cpus - any other binding policy is an
          * error
          */
-        if (!(OPAL_BIND_GIVEN & 
OPAL_GET_BINDING_POLICY(opal_hwloc_binding_policy))) {
+        if (OPAL_BIND_TO_NONE == 
OPAL_GET_BINDING_POLICY(opal_hwloc_binding_policy)) {
             if (opal_hwloc_use_hwthreads_as_cpus) {
                 OPAL_SET_BINDING_POLICY(opal_hwloc_binding_policy, 
OPAL_BIND_TO_HWTHREAD);
             } else {
                 OPAL_SET_BINDING_POLICY(opal_hwloc_binding_policy, 
OPAL_BIND_TO_CORE);
             }
-        } else {
+        } else if (OPAL_BIND_TO_L1CACHE < 
OPAL_GET_BINDING_POLICY(opal_hwloc_binding_policy)) {
             if (opal_hwloc_use_hwthreads_as_cpus) {
                 if (OPAL_BIND_TO_HWTHREAD != 
OPAL_GET_BINDING_POLICY(opal_hwloc_binding_policy)) {
                     orte_show_help("help-orte-rmaps-base.txt", 
"mismatch-binding", true,
Regards,
Tetsuya Mishima

>Okay, I fixed it. Keep getting caught by a very, very unfortunate design flaw 
>in hwloc that forces you to treat cache's as a special case that requires you 
>to 
call a different function. So you have to constantly protect function calls 
into hwloc with "if cache, call this one - else, call that one". REALLY 
irritating, and 
it caught us again here.
>
>Should be fixed now in trunk now, set to go over to 1.7.5
>
>Thanks
>Ralph
>
>On Feb 11, 2014, at 4:47 PM, tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp wrote:
>
>> 
>> Hi Ralph,
>> 
>> Since the ticket #4240 has been already set as fixed, I'm sending this
>> email to you. ( I don't konw I could add comments to the fixed ticket)
>> 
>> When I tried to bind the process to l3chace, it didn't work like below:
>> (the host mangae has the normal topology - not inverted)
>> 
>> [mishima@manage openmpi-1.7.4]$ mpirun -np 2 -bind-to l3cache
>> -report-bindings ~/mis/openmpi/demos/myprog
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> No objects of the specified type were found on at least one node:
>> 
>>  Type: Cache
>>  Node: manage
>> 
>> The map cannot be done as specified.
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> "-bind-to l1cache/l2cahce" doesn't work as well. At least, I confirmed that
>> the openmpi-1.7.4 works with "-bind-to l3cache".
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Tetsuya Mishima
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>
>_______________________________________________
>users mailing list
>us...@open-mpi.org
>http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users

----
Tetsuya Mishima  tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp

Reply via email to