-bycore should still be available for backward compatibility, so I'll check that one. I'll have to look to see what your binding pattern didn't work
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4044 On Jan 1, 2014, at 1:48 AM, Siegmar Gross <siegmar.gr...@informatik.hs-fulda.de> wrote: > > Option "-bycore" isn't available any longer. Is this intended? > > linpc1 openmpi_1.7.x_or_newer 111 mpiexec -report-bindings -np 4 \ > -host linpc0,linpc1,sunpc0,sunpc1 -cpus-per-proc 4 -bycore \ > -bind-to-core hostname > mpiexec: Error: unknown option "-bycore" > Type 'mpiexec --help' for usage. > linpc1 openmpi_1.7.x_or_newer 112 > > > linpc1 openmpi_1.7.x_or_newer 112 mpiexec -report-bindings \ > -np 4 -host linpc0,linpc1,sunpc0,sunpc1 -cpus-per-proc 4 \ > -bind-to-core hostname > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > A request was made to bind to that would result in binding more > processes than cpus on a resource: > > Bind to: CORE > Node: linpc0 > #processes: 2 > #cpus: 1 > > You can override this protection by adding the "overload-allowed" > option to your binding directive. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > linpc1 openmpi_1.7.x_or_newer 113 > > > > It worked with Open MPI 1.6.x. > > linpc1 openmpi_1.6.x 105 mpiexec -report-bindings -np 4 \ > -host linpc0,linpc1,sunpc0,sunpc1 -cpus-per-proc 4 -bycore \ > -bind-to-core hostname > [linpc1:09465] MCW rank 1 bound to socket 0[core 0-1] socket 1[core 0-1]: > [B B][B B] > linpc1 > [linpc0:01036] MCW rank 0 bound to socket 0[core 0-1] socket 1[core 0-1]: > [B B][B B] > linpc0 > [sunpc0:03796] MCW rank 2 bound to socket 0[core 0-1] socket 1[core 0-1]: > [B B][B B] > sunpc0 > [sunpc1:21335] MCW rank 3 bound to socket 0[core 0-1] socket 1[core 0-1]: > [B B][B B] > sunpc1 > linpc1 openmpi_1.6.x 106 > > > Have you changed the syntax once more so that I can get the > expected bindings with different command line options or is it > a problem in Open MPI 1.9.x?
