Heck if I know what might be wrong - it works fine for me, regardless of what 
machine I run it from.

If this is compiled with --enable-debug, try adding "--display-allocation -mca 
rmaps_base_verbose 5" to your cmd line to see what might be going on.


On Sep 3, 2013, at 1:20 AM, Siegmar Gross 
<siegmar.gr...@informatik.hs-fulda.de> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>> 3) I have a problem on "tyr" (Solaris 10 sparc).
>> 
>> tyr rankfiles 106 mpiexec -report-bindings \
>>  -rf rf_tyr_semicolon -np 1 hostname
>> [tyr.informatik.hs-fulda.de:29849] [[53951,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG:
>>  Not found in file
>>   
>> ../../../../../openmpi-1.9a1r29097/orte/mca/rmaps/rank_file/rmaps_rank_file.c
>>   at line 276
>> [tyr.informatik.hs-fulda.de:29849] [[53951,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG:
>>  Not found in file
>>  ../../../../openmpi-1.9a1r29097/orte/mca/rmaps/base/rmaps_base_map_job.c
>>  at line 173
>> tyr rankfiles 107
> 
> This one works now. I found a strange character in the rankfile, which
> I removed.
> 
> tyr rankfiles 103 mpiexec -report-bindings \
>  -rf rf_tyr_semicolon -np 1 hostname
> [tyr.informatik.hs-fulda.de:00079] MCW rank 0 bound to
>  socket 0[core 0[hwt 0]], socket 1[core 1[hwt 0]]: [B][B]
> tyr.informatik.hs-fulda.de
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> I get the following output, if I try the rankfile from a different machine
>> (also Solaris 10 sparc).
>> 
>> rs0 rankfiles 104 mpiexec -report-bindings -rf rf_tyr_semicolon -np 1 
>> hostname
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> All nodes which are allocated for this job are already filled.
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> rs0 rankfiles 105 
> 
> No change in this case.
> 
> rs0 rankfiles 102 mpiexec -report-bindings \
>  -rf rf_tyr_semicolon -np 1 hostname
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All nodes which are allocated for this job are already filled.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> I checked the other rankfiles as well and they are OK, so that
> problems 1) and 2) of my previous e-mail still exist.
> 
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> Siegmar
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users

Reply via email to