FWIW, the only restriction we have on the OMPI list is a max size of the message (including attachments). That might be a bit arcane and from when people didn't have big mailboxes, but... oh well. :-\
Can you just post the attachment somewhere we can all download it? On Aug 20, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Richard Haney <rfha...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is my fourth attempt to get past the robot censor. Not even text format > passed. If this message passes the censor, it is likely because attachments > are considered part of the "body" of the message, which the censor seems to > object to due to size. I am deleting the attachments. > > Re-sending: > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Richard Haney <rfha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Jeremiah, > > Your comments were most helpful. > > I did find where configure sets > > ompi_cv_asm_arch="IA32" > > and subsequently prints out [sic] > > checking for asssembly architecture... IA32 > > I tried changing the 'ompi_cv_asm_arch="IA32" ' to > > ompi_cv_asm_arch="AMD64" > > which was an alternative not chosen in the original configure because my long > has size 4 -- a very puzzling excuse for not using "AMD64". > > A more complete message from me "awaits moderator approval". > > It is a puzzle to me why the OpenMPI issue-reporting info asks for lots and > lots of info, including several compressed files of rather large files and > yet the listserv seems to have rather stringent size limits on the body of > messages. > > It seems as if the original designers and developers and maintainers had > grand, ambitious ideas for OpenMPI but that now the maintainers have > considerably deflated ambitions and hopes for OpenMPI. > > I am new to OpenMPI and I am only trying to build and install it because an > opt++2.4 numerical optimization package I want to install says it has > facilities to use any installed MPI. > > But I am having sooooooo much trouble with trying to build the package -- > specifically trying to get past the make of asm.c in /openmpi-1.6.5/opal/asm > -- that I'm wondering if it is worthwhile. > > Richard Haney > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Jeremiah Willcock <jewil...@osl.iu.edu> > wrote: > > ... > > Are you sure that the code is building with the right assembly file? > AMD64.asm looks to be using pushq, which is the right form to use for 64-bit > code. I suspect that this is a configure issue (detecting your architecture > as IA-32 and not x86-64), not a problem in the assembly files themselves. > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
