On Apr 30, 2013, at 1:54 PM, Vladimir Yamshchikov <yaxi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is the question I am trying to answer - how many threads I can use with 
> blastx on a grid? If I could request resources by_node, use -pernode option 
> to have one process per node, and then specify the correct number of threads 
> for each node. But I cannot, resurces (slots) are requested per-core 
> (per_process),

I don't believe that is true - resources are requested for the entire job, not 
for each process

> so I was instructed to request total number of slots. However, as allocated 
> cores are spread across the nodes, looks like it messes scheduling up causing 
> overload.

I suggest you look at the SGE documentation - I don't think you are using it 
correctly


> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
> 
> On Apr 30, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Vladimir Yamshchikov <yaxi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I asked grid IT and they said they had to kill it as the job was overloading 
>> nodes. They saw loads up to 180 instead of close to 12 on 12-core nodes. 
>> They think that blastx is not an openmpi application, so openMPI is spawning 
>> between 64-96 blastx processes, each of which is then starting up 96 worker 
>> threads. Or if blastx can work with openmpi, my blastx synthax mpirun syntax 
>> is wrong. Any advice?
>> I was advised earlier to use –pe openmpi [ARG} , where  ARG = 
>> number_of_processes x number_of_threads , and then pass desired number of 
>> threads as ‘ mpirun –np $NSLOTS cpus-per-proc [ number_of_threads]’. When I 
>> did that, I got an error that more threads were requested than number of 
>> physical cores.
>> 
> 
> How many threads are you trying to launch?? If it is a 12-core node, then you 
> can't have more than 12 - sounds like you are trying to startup 96!
> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Reuti <re...@staff.uni-marburg.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Am 30.04.2013 um 21:26 schrieb Vladimir Yamshchikov:
>> 
>> > My recent job started normally but after a few hours of running died with 
>> > the following message:
>> >
>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > A daemon (pid 19390) died unexpectedly with status 137 while attempting
>> > to launch so we are aborting.
>> 
>> I wonder why it rose the failure only after running for hours. As 137 = 128 
>> + 9 it was killed, maybe by the queuing system due to the set time limit? If 
>> you check the accouting, what is the output of:
>> 
>> $ qacct -j <job_id>
>> 
>> -- Reuti
>> 
>> 
>> > There may be more information reported by the environment (see above).
>> >
>> > This may be because the daemon was unable to find all the needed shared
>> > libraries on the remote node. You may set your LD_LIBRARY_PATH to have the
>> > location of the shared libraries on the remote nodes and this will
>> > automatically be forwarded to the remote nodes.
>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > mpirun noticed that the job aborted, but has no info as to the process
>> > that caused that situation.
>> >
>> > The scheduling script is below:
>> >
>> > #$ -S /bin/bash
>> > #$ -cwd
>> > #$ -N SC3blastx_64-96thr
>> > #$ -pe openmpi* 64-96
>> > #$ -l h_rt=24:00:00,vf=3G
>> > #$ -j y
>> > #$ -M yaxi...@gmail.com
>> > #$ -m eas
>> > #
>> > # Load the appropriate module files
>> > # Should be loaded already
>> > #$ -V
>> >
>> > mpirun -np $NSLOTS blastx -query 
>> > $UABGRID_SCRATCH/SC/AdQ30/fasta/SC1-IS4-Ind1-153ngFr1sep1run1R1AdQ30.fasta 
>> > -db nr -out 
>> > $UABGRID_SCRATCH/SC/blastx/SC/SC1-IS4-Ind1-153ngFr1sep1run1R1AdQ30.out 
>> > -evalue 0.001 -max_intron_length 100000 -outfmt 5 -num_alignments 20 
>> > -lcase_masking -num_threads $NSLOTS
>> >
>> > What caused this termination? It does not seem scheduling problem as the 
>> > program run several hours with 96 threads. My $LD_LIBRARY_PATH does have 
>> > /share/apps/openmpi/1.6.4-gcc/lib entry, so how else should I modify it?
>> >
>> > Vladimir
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > users mailing list
>> > us...@open-mpi.org
>> > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users

Reply via email to