...but only of v1.6.x.

On Dec 18, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:

> Also, be aware that the Cygwin folks have already released a fully functional 
> port of OMPI to that environment as a package. So if you want OMPI on Cygwin, 
> you can just download and install the Cygwin package - no need to build it 
> yourself.
> 
> 
> On Dec 18, 2012, at 7:23 AM, Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Dec 18, 2012, at 10:06 AM, JR Cary wrote:
>> 
>>> So, IMO, OpenMPI would have to turn to a different
>>> group for support.  E.g., Microsoft compatible HPC
>>> application vendors.  And for that one would need a
>>> compelling case of being better in, e.g., performance.
>> 
>> I doubt that a performance case could be made.  That is, I don't expect 
>> modern versions of Windows are any more/less efficient and integer/floating 
>> point ops (which are key to HPC apps) than modern versions of Linux or other 
>> OS's.  The underlying x86 hardware is the same (in most/commodity cases), 
>> after all.
>> 
>> Windows also has (effectively) an OS-bypass network stack, like Linux, for 
>> network providers.
>> 
>> Hence, I don't want to open the "Windows performance vs. Linux performance" 
>> religious debate.  I'm assuming that if someone cared, they could get 
>> comparable performance out of Windows and Linux.
>> 
>>> Perhaps there is another way?
>> 
>> 
>> At this point, I think we're up for volunteers.  :-\
>> 
>> FWIW: I'm still debating these cygwin patches.  
>> 
>> The cmake/native build process will likely go if no one steps up to maintain 
>> it.  But in our discussions, I don't think we've delineated between "Windows 
>> native" and "cygwin": a major difference is that he cygwin build uses the 
>> same Autotools build system that OMPI uses on POSIX systems.  And I don't 
>> know how much custom code cygwin requires vs. native Windows code (although 
>> I seem to recall that native windows code definitely performs better than 
>> its cygwin counterparts -- e.g., Windows SOCKETs are faster then cygwin 
>> POSIX sockets).
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jeff Squyres
>> jsquy...@cisco.com
>> For corporate legal information go to: 
>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/


Reply via email to