Yes, thank you!  Let us know the final link, and we'll put it on our 1.6.x 
download page. 

I think this still leaves open the question of what will happen with Open MPI 
Windows support beyond 1.6.x.  Please see:

    http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2012/10/11542.php

Reply on the devel list if anyone would be interested in maintaining Open MPI 
support for Windows.  Thanks.


On Nov 2, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:

> Very cool. Please let us know when you publish the package and give us a link 
> to it - would be nice to include that on our web page so Windows users have a 
> migration path now that native support is no longer available.
> 
> 
> On Nov 1, 2012, at 12:08 PM, marco atzeri <marco.atz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 11/1/2012 7:55 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Nov 1, 2012, at 11:47 AM, marco atzeri <marco.atz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 11/1/2012 5:08 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>>>> I think we'd be interested in looking at possibly adding this to the
>>>>> code base. We still need to announce this (and will shortly), but our
>>>>> Windows maintainer has moved on to other pastures. So support for native
>>>>> Windows operations is ending with the 1.6 series, barring someone
>>>>> stepping up to fill the void.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Having a cygwin alternative would let people at least continue to work
>>>>> on the Windows platform, albeit in a different mode. Is this something
>>>>> you are interested in pursuing?
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Ralph,
>>>> there is no special code on my packages, so deploying a cygwin package
>>>> was already on my plan.
>>>> It will be just an addition to the other packages for which I am already
>>>> the cygwin package maintainer
>>>> http://cygwin.com/cygwin-pkg-maint
>>>> 
>>>> I want just to be sure that it works as expect before deploying it,
>>>> and testing on a notebook is a bit limited.
>>>> 
>>>> The only peculiarity I noticed is that the stripped binaries do
>>>> not work, so the current package is based on unstripped installation.
>>>> 
>>>> Other step is to look if other options can be enabled:
>>>> 
>>>> LDFLAGS="-Wl,--export-all-symbols -no-undefined"  \
>>>> --disable-mca-dso \
>>>> --without-udapl \
>>>> --enable-cxx-exceptions \
>>>> --with-threads=posix \
>>>> --without-cs-fs \
>>>> --enable-heterogeneous \
>>>> --with-mpi-param_check=always \
>>>> --enable-contrib-no-build=vt,libompitrace \
>>>> --enable-mca-no-build=memory_mallopt,paffinity,installdirs-windows,timer-windows,shmem-sysv
>>>> 
>>>> at least "shmem-sysv" should be possible.
>>> 
>>> I see - that is even better than I had hoped! One question for you: does 
>>> this only allow single-machine operations, or can people run across 
>>> machines, assuming both are executing cygwin?
>>> 
>>> Guess I'm not sure how the latter would work, but my knowledge of cygwin is 
>>> very old.
>>> 
>> 
>> across machine with ssh should work, but I have no way to test in
>> this moment.
>> 
>> Marco
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/


Reply via email to