Wow - you are quite correct. Thanks for chasing this down!! On Oct 31, 2012, at 1:56 AM, marco atzeri <marco.atz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> looking on a solution for > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2012/10/20495.php > > I noticed that the issue disappears on 1.6.2 with the patch: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > --- opal/util/path.c~ 2012-04-03 16:29:52.000000000 +0200 > +++ opal/util/path.c 2012-10-30 20:31:43.772749400 +0100 > @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ > > /* If absolute path is given, return it without searching. */ > if( opal_path_is_absolute(fname) ) { > - return opal_path_access(fname, "", mode); > + return opal_path_access(fname, NULL , mode); > } > > /* Initialize. */ > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > For what I can see on the function body, the test on path > is expecting path to be a null pointer and not a > pointer to an empty strings > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > char *opal_path_access(char *fname, char *path, int mode) > { > char *fullpath = NULL; > struct stat buf; > > /* Allocate space for the full pathname. */ > if (NULL == path) { > fullpath = opal_os_path(false, fname, NULL); > } else { > fullpath = opal_os_path(false, path, fname, NULL); > } > if (NULL == fullpath) > return NULL; > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Regards > Marco > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
