Huh - that is totally weird. I'll take a look

On Oct 17, 2012, at 9:02 AM, Brian Budge <brian.bu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ralph -
> 
> No, it appears that 1.6.3rc1 does not work either.
> 
> Thanks
>  Brian
> 
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>> Can you please check the 1.6.3 release candidate and see if it is there? I 
>> suspect that the issue here is that the patch didn't get into the 1.6.2 
>> official release, and the version numbers in the repo didn't immediately get 
>> updated - so the nightly build was still labeled as 1.6.2 even after the 
>> official release came out.
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 16, 2012, at 10:46 AM, Brian Budge <brian.bu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi all -
>>> 
>>> There was a bug in version 1.6.1 that caused singleton spawn not to
>>> work correctly with multi-machine configurations.  I verified that a
>>> nightly build of 1.6.2 fixed this issue, in particular 1.6.2a1r27234
>>> works.  I just grabbed the 1.6.2 official release, and it appears that
>>> somehow the fix has been removed.
>>> 
>>> I am testing with the simple_spawn.c example.  Instead of passing
>>> MPI_INFO_NULL to the spawn call, I create an Info object, and set the
>>> "add-host" to a comma delimited list of nodes.  When I run this in the
>>> nightly mentioned above, without mpirun, everything works as expected
>>> (the nodes I list in the "add-host" are in the output text of the
>>> program).  When I run the same code with the released 1.6.2, I get the
>>> old behavior from 1.6.1 where all slaves run on localhost.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Brian
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users


Reply via email to