On Jun 29, 2012, at 2:14 PM, Yong Qin wrote: > Thanks Jeff for the doc. However I'm not sure if I understand your > following comment correctly. If I remove the MX BTL plugins, a.k.a., > mca_btl_mx.la and mca_btl_mx.so, I'm now getting errors of these > components not found. > > [n0026.hbar:09467] mca: base: component_find: unable to open > .../mca_btl_mx.la: file not found (ignored) > [n0026.hbar:09467] mca: base: component_find: unable to open > .../mca_btl_mx.so: file not found (ignored) > > And it still uses TCP BTL instead of MX MTL from what I can tell. Am I > doing things wrong?
Yoinks, I'm sorry -- that's not quite what I meant. I meant remove the *BTL* plugin, not the *MTL* plugin. I.e., if *only* the MX MTL is there, there should be no conflict between the two (per that bug you and George found), and you should be ok. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
