Google around / check textbooks, but you need to check how much time is being 
spent by each part of your application.  

E.g., if just reading from disk / writing back to disk takes 6.5 seconds, then 
the parallel part is trivial.

You should time the parts of your program and see what part(s) is(are) taking 
the longest, and see how to improve them.

A general rule of thumb: remember that MPI_SEND / MPI_RECV are "fast", but are 
both limited by your underlying network (among other reasons), and are 
considerably slower than CPU speeds.  Hence, the work required to split up your 
problem into multiple parts and use MPI to communicate those parts to the 
remote workers can be considered overhead -- you should minimize all that 
overhead in comparison to CPU computation whenever possible.  For example, 
ensure that the amount of computation work that you're giving to each MPI 
process is large enough to outweigh the cost of communicating with that MPI 
process.

As a corollary to that: if you have too little work to do, the overhead of 
parallelization can quickly overtake any performance benefits (e.g., wall clock 
execution time).  Concrete example: if you're only sorting a small number of 
integers (e.g., 100 integers), it's quite possible that parallelizing that will 
be *slower* than just doing it serially.



On May 9, 2012, at 8:56 AM, seshendra seshu wrote:

> Hi,
> Iam very new to parallel computing and MPI, with intested i have written an 
> sorting algorithm with MPI. The problem is i tried reduce the execution time 
> i.e sorting with increase in nodes but the problem is iam unable drease the 
> time and i was getting like for 4nodes(1Master and 2 slaves) was getting an 
> avg of 6.56 sec , for  8nodes(1Master and 7 slaves) was getting an avg of 
> 6.62 sec and for 15nodes(1Master and 15 slaves) was getting an avg of 6.63 
> sec. i am unable for  find out an clue according to theory time has been 
> decreased for the increase in nodes but iwas getting an increase or constant. 
> Please help me solving this.
> 
> 
> thanking you
> 
> -- 
>  WITH REGARDS
> M.L.N.Seshendra
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/


Reply via email to