I use 2.68 and 2.65 and have no problems. Could be that 2.67 has a problem - perhaps try with one of the other levels?
On Dec 29, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Dmitry N. Mikushin wrote: > OK, apparently that were various backports. And now I have only one > autoconf installed, and it is: > > marcusmae@teslatron:~/Programming/openmpi-r24785$ autoconf --version > autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.67 > > marcusmae@teslatron:~/Programming/openmpi-r24785$ autoreconf --version > autoreconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.67 > > However: > > 6. Processing autogen.subdirs directories > > === Processing subdir: > /home/marcusmae/Programming/openmpi-r24785/opal/mca/event/libevent207/libevent > --- Found autogen.sh; running... > autoreconf: Entering directory `.' > autoreconf: configure.in: not using Gettext > autoreconf: running: aclocal --force -I m4 > autoreconf: configure.in: tracing > autoreconf: configure.in: not using Libtool > autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoconf --force > configure.in:113: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL > If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. > See the Autoconf documentation. > autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1 > Command failed: ./autogen.sh > > Does it work for you with 2.67? > > Thanks, > - D. > > 2011/12/30 Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org>: >> >> On Dec 29, 2011, at 3:39 PM, Dmitry N. Mikushin wrote: >> >>> No, that was autoREconf, and all they are below 2.65: >>> >>> marcusmae@teslatron:~/Programming/openmpi-r24785$ ls /usr/bin/autoreconf >>> autoreconf autoreconf2.13 autoreconf2.50 autoreconf2.59 >>> autoreconf2.64 >>> >>> And default one points to 2.50: >>> >>> marcusmae@teslatron:~/Programming/openmpi-r24785$ autoreconf -help >>> Usage: /usr/bin/autoreconf2.50 [OPTION]... [DIRECTORY]... >>> >>> I don't know why, probably that's the default Debian Squeeze setup? >> >> Probably - but that's no good. It should be the same level as autoconf as >> the two are packaged together to avoid incompatibilities like you are >> hitting here. Did you install autoconf yourself? If so, can you point >> autoreconf to the corresponding binary? >> >>> >>> - D. >>> >>> 2011/12/30 Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org>: >>>> Strange - if you look at your original output, autoconf is identified as >>>> 2.50 - a version that is way too old for us. However, what you just sent >>>> now shows 2.67, which would be fine. >>>> >>>> Why the difference? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Dec 29, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Dmitry N. Mikushin wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Ralph, >>>>> >>>>> URL: http://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/ompi/trunk >>>>> Repository Root: http://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/ompi >>>>> Repository UUID: 63e3feb5-37d5-0310-a306-e8a459e722fe >>>>> Revision: 24785 >>>>> Node Kind: directory >>>>> Schedule: normal >>>>> Last Changed Author: rhc >>>>> Last Changed Rev: 24785 >>>>> Last Changed Date: 2011-06-17 22:01:23 +0400 (Fri, 17 Jun 2011) >>>>> >>>>> 1. Checking tool versions >>>>> >>>>> Searching for autoconf >>>>> Found autoconf version 2.67; checking version... >>>>> Found version component 2 -- need 2 >>>>> Found version component 67 -- need 65 >>>>> ==> ACCEPTED >>>>> Searching for libtoolize >>>>> Found libtoolize version 2.2.6b; checking version... >>>>> Found version component 2 -- need 2 >>>>> Found version component 2 -- need 2 >>>>> Found version component 6b -- need 6b >>>>> ==> ACCEPTED >>>>> Searching for automake >>>>> Found automake version 1.11.1; checking version... >>>>> Found version component 1 -- need 1 >>>>> Found version component 11 -- need 11 >>>>> Found version component 1 -- need 1 >>>>> ==> ACCEPTED >>>>> >>>>> 2011/12/30 Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org>: >>>>>> Are you doing this on a subversion checkout? Of which branch? >>>>>> >>>>>> Did you check your autotoll versions to ensure you meet the minimum >>>>>> required levels? The requirements differ by version. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 29, 2011, at 2:52 PM, Dmitry N. Mikushin wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear Open MPI Community, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I need a custom OpenMPI build. While running ./autogen.pl on Debian >>>>>>> Squeeze, there is an error: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- Found autogen.sh; running... >>>>>>> autoreconf2.50: Entering directory `.' >>>>>>> autoreconf2.50: configure.in: not using Gettext >>>>>>> autoreconf2.50: running: aclocal --force -I m4 >>>>>>> autoreconf2.50: configure.in: tracing >>>>>>> autoreconf2.50: configure.in: not using Libtool >>>>>>> autoreconf2.50: running: /usr/bin/autoconf --force >>>>>>> configure.in:113: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL >>>>>>> If this token and others are legitimate, please use >>>>>>> m4_pattern_allow. >>>>>>> See the Autoconf documentation. >>>>>>> autoreconf2.50: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1 >>>>>>> Command failed: ./autogen.sh >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's a bit confusing, because automake, libtool, autoconf are >>>>>>> installed. What might be the other reasons of this error? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> - Dima. >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> users mailing list >>>>>>> us...@open-mpi.org >>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> users mailing list >>>>>> us...@open-mpi.org >>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> users mailing list >>>>> us...@open-mpi.org >>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> users mailing list >>>> us...@open-mpi.org >>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> users mailing list >>> us...@open-mpi.org >>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> us...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
