On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 07:24:24AM -0600, Ralph Castain wrote: > Oh my - that is such an old version! Any reason for using it instead of > something more recent?
I'm using the cluster of the university where I work und I'm not the admin. So I'm going with what is installed there. It's the first time I'm using MPI. Before I complain to the admins about old versions or anything else, I'd like to check whether my code actually should be okay in regard to MPI specifications. > On Jun 11, 2011, at 8:43 AM, Ole Kliemann wrote: > > > Hi everyone! > > > > I'm trying to use MPI on a cluster running OpenMPI 1.2.4 and starting > > processes through PBSPro_11.0.2.110766. I've been running into a couple > > of performance and deadlock problems and like to check whether I'm > > making a mistake. > > > > One of the deadlocks I managed to boil down to the attached example. I > > run it on 8 cores. It usually deadlocks with all except one process > > showing > > > > start barrier > > > > as last output. > > > > The one process out of order shows: > > > > start getting local > > > > My question at this point is simply whether this is expected behaviour > > of OpenMPI. > > > > Thanks in advance! > > Ole > > <mpi_barrier.cc>_______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > us...@open-mpi.org > > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
pgpPy9ChA3Yth.pgp
Description: PGP signature
