Perhaps often it is more useful to use MPI_WAIT rather than MPI_TEST type fucntions, because at MPI_WAIT point it will be taken care of communication completion, automatically, which may be necessary before going ahead. with MPI_TEST it would become the responsibility of the programmer to handle the situation if the test is FALSE/FAILED.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: > Yes; you can use any of the various flavors of the MPI_TEST* functions. > > On Feb 2, 2011, at 7:03 AM, Bibrak Qamar wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > Is there any way to find whether a non blocking communication has > finished without calling the wait( ) function. > > > > > > Thanks > > Bibrak Qamar > > Undergraduate Student BIT-9 > > Member Center for High Performance Scientific Computing > > NUST-School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > us...@open-mpi.org > > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users > > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquy...@cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >
