I believe the libtool version (<2.2.8) used to make the 1.4.3 and 1.5 tarball does not have this fix. I have opened a ticket to get this fixed - https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/2626
--Nysal On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Price, Brian M (N-KCI) < brian.m.pr...@lmco.com> wrote: > Thanks, Nysal. > > > > The only problem I’m having now is connecting a libtool version (e.g. > 2.2.8) with an OpenMPI version. I’m sorry if it’s a silly question, but can > you tell me in which version of OpenMPI this problem will go away? > > > > Thanks, again. > > > > Brian > > > > > > *From:* users-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] *On > Behalf Of *Nysal Jan > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 10, 2010 12:19 AM > *To:* Open MPI Users > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [OMPI users] Creating 64-bit objects? > > > > Hi Brian, > This problem was first reported by Paul H. Hargrove in the developer > mailing list. It is a bug in libtool and has been fixed in the latest > release (2.2.8). More details are available here - > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2010/10/8606.php > > Regards > --Nysal > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Price, Brian M (N-KCI) < > brian.m.pr...@lmco.com> wrote: > > OpenMPI version: 1.3.3 & 1.4.3 > > Platform: IBM P5 > > Issue: I want OpenMPI to support some existing 64-bit FORTRAN software, > but I can’t seem to get 64-bit objects from OpenMPI without some > modification to the Makefile in ompi/mpi/f90. > > I can configure, build, and install just fine with the following compilers: > > - CC = xlC_r > > - CXX = xlC_r > > - F77 = xlf95_r > > - FC = xlf95_r > > But, this configuration produces 32-bit objects for all languages. > > So, to produce 64-bit objects for all languages, I supply the following > flags: > > - CFLAGS = -q64 > > - CXXFLAGS = -q64 > > - FFLAGS = -q64 > > - FCFLAGS = -q64 > > This configuration results in the following error during the build (more > specifically, link) phase: > > - When creating libmpi_f90.la in ompi/mpi/f90 > > - COMMANDS: > > o /bin/sh ../../../libtool --mode=link xlf95_r -I../../../ompi/include > -I../../../ompi/include -I. -I. -I../../../ompi/mpi/f90 -q64 -version-info > 0:1:0 -export-dynamic -o libmpi_f90.la -rpath <prefix>/lib mpi.lo > mpi_sizeof.lo mpi_comm_spawn_multiple_f90.lo mpi_testall_f90.lo > mpi_testsome_f90.lo mpi_waitall_f90.lo mpi_waitsome_f90.lo mpi_wtick_f90.lo > mpi_wtime_f90.lo ../../../ompi/libmpi.la -lnsl -lutil > > o libtool: link: /usr/bin/ld -m elf64ppc -shared .libs/mpi.o > .libs/mpi_sizeof.o .libs/mpi_comm_spawn_multiple_f90.o > .libs/mpi_testall_f90.o .libs/mpi_testsome_f90.o .libs/mpi_waitall_f90.o > .libs/mpi_waitsome_f90.o .libs/mpi_wtick_f90.o .libs/mpi_wtime_f90.lo > -L<topdir>/orte/.libs -L<topdir>/opal/.libs ../../../ompi/.libs/libmpi.so > <topdir>/orte/.libs/libopen-rte.so <topdir>/opal/.libs/libopen-pal.so -ldl > -lnsl -lutil -q64 -soname libmpi_f90.so.0 -o .libs/libmpi_f90.so.0.0.1 > > - OUTPUT: > > /usr/bin/ld: unrecognized option ‘-q64’ > > /usr/bin/ld: use the --help option for usage information > > make[4]: *** [libmpi_f90.la] Error 1 > > make[4]: Leaving directory `<topdir>/ompi/mpi/f90` > > make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > > make[3]: Leaving directory `<topdir>/ompi/mpi/f90` > > make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 > > make[2]: Leaving directory `<topdir>/ompi/mpi/f90` > > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `<topdir>/ompi` > > make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > > > > The -q64 option, while valid for the xlf95_r compiler, is not a valid > option for /usr/bin/ld. So, I’m wondering why this option got passed to > /usr/bin/ld. After looking at <topdir>/ompi/mpi/f90/Makefile, I see that > FCFLAGS shows up in link lines (“libmpi_f90_la_LINK” and “FCLINK”). This > direction seems to come from Makefile.in. > > If I remove these FCFLAGS references from the Makefile, I am able to > complete the build and install of OpenMPI, and it seems to correctly support > my existing software. > > So, now for my question: > > Should FCFLAGS show up on these links lines and, if so, how would I get > 64-bit objects? > > Thanks, > > Brian Price > > > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users > > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users >
