Thanks a lot for your reply, Doug.

There is one more thing I forgot to mention. For 500 nodes test, I observe
if I use SGE, it runs only almost half of our cluster, like 35-38 nodes, not
uniformly distributed on the whole cluster but the running time is still
good.  So I guess it is not a hyperthreading problem.

Linbao

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Doug Reeder <d...@cox.net> wrote:

> In my experience hyperthreading can't really deliver two cores worth of
> processing simultaneously for processes expecting sole use of a core. Since
> you really have 512 cores I'm not surprised that you see a performance hit
> when requesting > 512 compute units. We should really get input from a
> hyperthreading expert, preferably form intel.
>
> Doug Reeder
> On Oct 4, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Storm Zhang wrote:
>
> We have 64 compute nodes which are dual qual-core and hyperthreaded CPUs.
> So we have 1024 compute units shown in the ROCKS 5.3 system. I'm trying to
> scatter an array from the master node to the compute nodes using mpiCC and
> mpirun using C++.
>
> Here is my test:
>
> The array size is 18KB * Number of compute nodes and is scattered to the
> compute nodes 5000 times repeatly.
>
> The average running time(seconds):
>
> 100 nodes: 170,
> 400 nodes: 690,
> 500 nodes: 855,
> 600 nodes: 2550,
> 700 nodes: 2720,
> 800 nodes: 2900,
>
> There is a big jump of running time from 500 nodes to 600 nodes. Don't
> know what's the problem.
> Tried both in OMPI 1.3.2 and OMPI 1.4.2. Running time is a little faster
> for all the tests in 1.4.2 but the jump still exists.
> Tried using either Bcast function or simply Send/Recv which give very close
> results.
> Tried both in running it directly or using SGE and got the same results.
>
> The code and ompi_info are attached to this email. The direct running
> command is :
> /opt/openmpi/bin/mpirun --mca btl_tcp_if_include eth0 --machinefile
> ../machines -np 600 scatttest
>
> The ifconfig of head node for eth0 is:
> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:26:B9:56:8B:44
>           inet addr:192.168.1.1  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           inet6 addr: fe80::226:b9ff:fe56:8b44/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:1096060373 errors:0 dropped:2512622 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:513387679 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>           RX bytes:832328807459 (775.1 GiB)  TX bytes:250824621959 (233.5
> GiB)
>           Interrupt:106 Memory:d6000000-d6012800
>
> A typical ifconfig of a compute node is:
> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:21:9B:9A:15:AC
>           inet addr:192.168.1.253  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           inet6 addr: fe80::221:9bff:fe9a:15ac/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:362716422 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:349967746 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>           RX bytes:139699954685 (130.1 GiB)  TX bytes:338207741480 (314.9
> GiB)
>           Interrupt:82 Memory:d6000000-d6012800
>
>
> Does anyone help me out of this? It bothers me a lot.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Linbao
> <scatttest.cpp><ompi_info>_______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>

Reply via email to