MPI_IN_PLACE is defined in both mpif.h and the "mpi" Fortran module.
Does the subroutine in question have "include mpif.h" or "use mpi"? On Aug 16, 2010, at 3:55 PM, Richard Walsh wrote: > > All, > > I have a fortran code (Octopus 3.2) that is bombing during a build in a > routine that uses: > > call MPI_Allreduce(MPI_IN_PLACE, rho(1, ispin), np, MPI_DOUBLE_PRECISION, > MPI_SUM, st%mpi_grp%comm, mpi_err) > > with the error message: > > states.F90(1240): error #6404: This name does not have a type, and must have > an explicit type. [MPI_IN_PLACE] > call MPI_Allreduce(MPI_IN_PLACE, rho(1, ispin), np, > MPI_DOUBLE_PRECISION, MPI_SUM, st%mpi_grp%comm, mpi_err) > ---------------------------^ > compilation aborted for states_oct.f90 (code 1) > > This suggests that MPI_IN_PLACE is missing from the mpi.h header. > > Any thoughts? > > rbw > > Richard Walsh > Parallel Applications and Systems Manager > CUNY HPC Center, Staten Island, NY > 718-982-3319 > 612-382-4620 > > Reason does give the heart pause; > As the heart gives reason fits. > > Yet, to live where reason always rules; > Is to kill one's heart with wits. > ________________________________________ > From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org [users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of > Gokhan Kir [g...@iastate.edu] > Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 5:43 PM > To: us...@open-mpi.org > Subject: [OMPI users] A Problem with RAxML > > Hi, > I am currently using RAxML 7.0, and recently I got a problem. Even though I > Googled it, I couldn't find a satisfying answer. > I got this message from BATCH_ERRORs file " raxmlHPC-MPI: topologies.c:179: > restoreTL: Assertion `n >= 0 && n < rl->max' failed. " > > Any help is appreciated, > > Thanks, > > -- > Gokhan > > Think green before you print this email. > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
