On Aug 10, 2010, at 3:59 PM, Gus Correa wrote: > Thank you for opening a ticket and taking care of this.
Sorry -- I missed your inline questions when I first read this mail... > > That being said, we didn't previously find any correctness > > issues with using an alignment of 1. > > Does it affect only the information > provided by ompi_info, as Martin Siegert suggested? > Or does it really affect the actual alignment of > MPI types when OpenMPI is compiled with Intel, > as Martin, Ake Sandgren, Hugo Gagnon, and myself > thought it might? It affects both: I do see the size and alignment of double precisions (as determined by configure) used in the OMPI datatype engine (and real8, etc.). We had a copy-n-paste error in ompi_info such that some Fortran types were displaying the wrong sizes / alignments. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
