After running on two processors across two nodes, the problem occurs
much earlier during execution:

(gdb) bt
#0  opal_sys_timer_get_cycles ()
at ../opal/include/opal/sys/amd64/timer.h:46
#1  opal_timer_base_get_cycles ()
at ../opal/mca/timer/linux/timer_linux.h:31
#2  opal_progress () at runtime/opal_progress.c:181
#3  0x00002b4bc3c00215 in opal_condition_wait (count=2,
requests=0x7fff33372480, statuses=0x7fff33372450)
    at ../opal/threads/condition.h:99
#4  ompi_request_default_wait_all (count=2, requests=0x7fff33372480,
statuses=0x7fff33372450) at request/req_wait.c:262
#5  0x00002b4bc3c915b7 in ompi_coll_tuned_sendrecv_actual
(sendbuf=0x2aaad11dfaf0, scount=117692, 
    sdatatype=0x2b4bc3fa9ea0, dest=1, stag=-13, recvbuf=<value optimized
out>, rcount=117692, 
    rdatatype=0x2b4bc3fa9ea0, source=1, rtag=-13, comm=0x12cd98c0,
status=0x0) at coll_tuned_util.c:55
#6  0x00002b4bc3c982db in ompi_coll_tuned_sendrecv (sbuf=0x2aaad10f9d10,
scount=117692, sdtype=0x2b4bc3fa9ea0, 
    rbuf=0x2aaae104d010, rcount=117692, rdtype=0x2b4bc3fa9ea0,
comm=0x12cd98c0, module=0x12cda340)
    at coll_tuned_util.h:60
#7  ompi_coll_tuned_alltoall_intra_two_procs (sbuf=0x2aaad10f9d10,
scount=117692, sdtype=0x2b4bc3fa9ea0, 
    rbuf=0x2aaae104d010, rcount=117692, rdtype=0x2b4bc3fa9ea0,
comm=0x12cd98c0, module=0x12cda340)
    at coll_tuned_alltoall.c:432
#8  0x00002b4bc3c1b71f in PMPI_Alltoall (sendbuf=0x2aaad10f9d10,
sendcount=117692, sendtype=0x2b4bc3fa9ea0, 
    recvbuf=0x2aaae104d010, recvcount=117692, recvtype=0x2b4bc3fa9ea0,
comm=0x12cd98c0) at palltoall.c:84
#9  0x00002b4bc399cc86 in mpi_alltoall_f (sendbuf=0x2aaad10f9d10 "Z\n
\271\356\023\254\271?", sendcount=0x7fff33372688, 
    sendtype=<value optimized out>, recvbuf=0x2aaae104d010 "",
recvcount=0x7fff3337268c, recvtype=0xb67490, 
    comm=0x12d9d20, ierr=0x7fff33372690) at palltoall_f.c:76
#10 0x00000000004613b8 in m_alltoall_z_ ()
#11 0x00000000004ec55f in redis_pw_ ()
#12 0x00000000005643d0 in choleski_mp_orthch_ ()
#13 0x000000000043fbba in MAIN__ ()
#14 0x000000000042f15c in main ()

On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 06:14 -0400, Terry Dontje wrote:
> A clarification from your previous email, you had your code working
> with OMPI 1.4.1 but an older version of OFED?  Then you upgraded to
> OFED 1.4 and things stopped working?  Sounds like your current system
> is set up with OMPI 1.4.2 and OFED 1.5.  Anyways, I am a little
> confused as to when things might have actually broke.
> 
> My first guess would be something may be wrong with the OFED setup.
> Have checked the status of your ib devices with ibv_devinfo?  Have you
> ran any of the OFED rc tests like ibv_rc_pingpong?  
> 
> If the above seems ok have you tried to run a simpler OMPI test like
> connectivity?  I would see if a simple np=2 run spanning across two
> nodes fails?
> 
> What OS distribution and version you are running on?
> 
> --td
> Brian Smith wrote: 
> > In case my previous e-mail is too vague for anyone to address, here's a
> > backtrace from my application.  This version, compiled with Intel
> > 11.1.064 (OpenMPI 1.4.2 w/ gcc 4.4.2), hangs during MPI_Alltoall
> > instead.  Running on 16 CPUs, Opteron 2427, Mellanox Technologies
> > MT25418 w/ OFED 1.5
> > 
> > strace on all ranks repeatedly shows:
> > poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=5, events=POLLIN}, {fd=6,
> > events=POLLIN}, {fd=7, events=POLLIN}, {fd=10, events=POLLIN}, {fd=22,
> > events=POLLIN}, {fd=23, events=POLLIN}], 7, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
> > ...
> > 
> > gdb --pid=<pid>
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0  sm_fifo_read () at btl_sm.h:267
> > #1  mca_btl_sm_component_progress () at btl_sm_component.c:391
> > #2  0x00002b00085116ea in opal_progress () at
> > runtime/opal_progress.c:207
> > #3  0x00002b0007def215 in opal_condition_wait (count=2,
> > requests=0x7fffd27802a0, statuses=0x7fffd2780270)
> >     at ../opal/threads/condition.h:99
> > #4  ompi_request_default_wait_all (count=2, requests=0x7fffd27802a0,
> > statuses=0x7fffd2780270) at request/req_wait.c:262
> > #5  0x00002b0007e805b7 in ompi_coll_tuned_sendrecv_actual
> > (sendbuf=0x2aaac2c4c210, scount=28000, 
> >     sdatatype=0x2b0008198ea0, dest=6, stag=-13, recvbuf=<value optimized
> > out>, rcount=28000, rdatatype=0x2b0008198ea0, 
> >     source=10, rtag=-13, comm=0x16ad7420, status=0x0) at
> > coll_tuned_util.c:55
> > #6  0x00002b0007e8705f in ompi_coll_tuned_sendrecv (sbuf=0x2aaac2b04010,
> > scount=28000, sdtype=0x2b0008198ea0, 
> >     rbuf=0x2aaac99a2010, rcount=28000, rdtype=0x2b0008198ea0,
> > comm=0x16ad7420, module=0x16ad8450)
> >     at coll_tuned_util.h:60
> > #7  ompi_coll_tuned_alltoall_intra_pairwise (sbuf=0x2aaac2b04010,
> > scount=28000, sdtype=0x2b0008198ea0, 
> >     rbuf=0x2aaac99a2010, rcount=28000, rdtype=0x2b0008198ea0,
> > comm=0x16ad7420, module=0x16ad8450)
> >     at coll_tuned_alltoall.c:70
> > #8  0x00002b0007e0a71f in PMPI_Alltoall (sendbuf=0x2aaac2b04010,
> > sendcount=28000, sendtype=0x2b0008198ea0, 
> >     recvbuf=0x2aaac99a2010, recvcount=28000, recvtype=0x2b0008198ea0,
> > comm=0x16ad7420) at palltoall.c:84
> > #9  0x00002b0007b8bc86 in mpi_alltoall_f (sendbuf=0x2aaac2b04010 "",
> > sendcount=0x7fffd27806a0, 
> >     sendtype=<value optimized out>, 
> >     recvbuf=0x2aaac99a2010 "6%\177e\373\354\306>\346\226z\262\347\350
> > \260>\032ya(\303\003\272\276\231\343\322\363zjþ\230\247i\232\307PԾ(\304
> > \373\321D\261ľ\204֜Εh־H\266H\342l2\245\276\231C7]\003\250Ǿ`\277\231\272
> > \265E\261>j\213ѓ\370\002\263>НØx.\254>}\332-\313\371\326\320>\346\245f
> > \304\f\214\262\276\070\222zf#'\321>\024\066̆\026\227ɾ.T\277\266}\366
> > \270>h|\323L\330\fƾ^z\214!q*\277\276pQ?O\346\067\270>~\006\300",
> > recvcount=0x7fffd27806a4, recvtype=0xb67490, 
> >     comm=0x12d9ba0, ierr=0x7fffd27806a8) at palltoall_f.c:76
> > #10 0x00000000004634cc in m_sumf_d_ ()
> > #11 0x0000000000463072 in m_sum_z_ ()
> > #12 0x00000000004c8a8b in mrg_grid_rc_ ()
> > #13 0x00000000004ffc5e in rhosym_ ()
> > #14 0x0000000000610dc6 in us_mp_set_charge_ ()
> > #15 0x0000000000771c43 in elmin_ ()
> > #16 0x0000000000453853 in MAIN__ ()
> > #17 0x000000000042f15c in main ()
> > 
> > On other processes:
> > 
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0  0x0000003692a0b725 in pthread_spin_lock ()
> > from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> > #1  0x00002aaaaacdfa7b in ibv_cmd_create_qp ()
> > from /usr/lib64/libmlx4-rdmav2.so
> > #2  0x00002b9dc1db3ff8 in progress_one_device ()
> > at /usr/include/infiniband/verbs.h:884
> > #3  btl_openib_component_progress () at btl_openib_component.c:3451
> > #4  0x00002b9dc24736ea in opal_progress () at
> > runtime/opal_progress.c:207
> > #5  0x00002b9dc1d51215 in opal_condition_wait (count=2,
> > requests=0x7fffece3cc20, statuses=0x7fffece3cbf0)
> >     at ../opal/threads/condition.h:99
> > #6  ompi_request_default_wait_all (count=2, requests=0x7fffece3cc20,
> > statuses=0x7fffece3cbf0) at request/req_wait.c:262
> > #7  0x00002b9dc1de25b7 in ompi_coll_tuned_sendrecv_actual
> > (sendbuf=0x2aaac2c4c210, scount=28000, 
> >     sdatatype=0x2b9dc20faea0, dest=6, stag=-13, recvbuf=<value optimized
> > out>, rcount=28000, rdatatype=0x2b9dc20faea0, 
> >     source=10, rtag=-13, comm=0x1745b420, status=0x0) at
> > coll_tuned_util.c:55
> > #8  0x00002b9dc1de905f in ompi_coll_tuned_sendrecv (sbuf=0x2aaac2b04010,
> > scount=28000, sdtype=0x2b9dc20faea0, 
> >     rbuf=0x2aaac99a2010, rcount=28000, rdtype=0x2b9dc20faea0,
> > comm=0x1745b420, module=0x1745c450)
> >     at coll_tuned_util.h:60
> > #9  ompi_coll_tuned_alltoall_intra_pairwise (sbuf=0x2aaac2b04010,
> > scount=28000, sdtype=0x2b9dc20faea0, 
> >     rbuf=0x2aaac99a2010, rcount=28000, rdtype=0x2b9dc20faea0,
> > comm=0x1745b420, module=0x1745c450)
> >     at coll_tuned_alltoall.c:70
> > #10 0x00002b9dc1d6c71f in PMPI_Alltoall (sendbuf=0x2aaac2b04010,
> > sendcount=28000, sendtype=0x2b9dc20faea0, 
> >     recvbuf=0x2aaac99a2010, recvcount=28000, recvtype=0x2b9dc20faea0,
> > comm=0x1745b420) at palltoall.c:84
> > #11 0x00002b9dc1aedc86 in mpi_alltoall_f (sendbuf=0x2aaac2b04010 "",
> > sendcount=0x7fffece3d020, 
> >     sendtype=<value optimized out>, 
> >     recvbuf=0x2aaac99a2010 "6%\177e\373\354\306>\346\226z\262\347\350
> > \260>\032ya(\303\003\272\276\231\343\322\363zjþ\230\247i\232\307PԾ(\304
> > \373\321D\261ľ\204֜Εh־H\266H\342l2\245\276\231C7]\003\250Ǿ`\277\231\272
> > \265E\261>j\213ѓ\370\002\263>НØx.\254>}\332-\313\371\326\320>\346\245f
> > \304\f\214\262\276\070\222zf#'\321>\024\066̆\026\227ɾ.T\277\266}\366
> > \270>h|\323L\330\fƾ^z\214!q*\277\276pQ?O\346\067\270>~\006\300",
> > recvcount=0x7fffece3d024, recvtype=0xb67490, 
> >     comm=0x12d9ba0, ierr=0x7fffece3d028) at palltoall_f.c:76
> > #12 0x00000000004634cc in m_sumf_d_ ()
> > #13 0x0000000000463072 in m_sum_z_ ()
> > #14 0x00000000004c8a8b in mrg_grid_rc_ ()
> > #15 0x00000000004ffc5e in rhosym_ ()
> > #16 0x0000000000610dc6 in us_mp_set_charge_ ()
> > #17 0x0000000000771c43 in elmin_ ()
> > #18 0x0000000000453853 in MAIN__ ()
> > #19 0x000000000042f15c in main ()
> > 
> > 
> > I set up padb to collect a full report on the process and I've attached
> > it to this message.  Let me know if I can provide anything further.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > -Brian
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 10:07 -0400, Brian Smith wrote:
> >   
> > > Hi, All,
> > > 
> > > A couple of applications that I'm using -- VASP and Charmm -- end up
> > > "stuck" (for lack of a better word) during a waitall call after some
> > > non-blocking send/recv action.  This only happens when utilizing the
> > > openib btl.  I've followed a couple of bugs where this seemed to happen
> > > in some previous revisions and tried the work-arounds provided, but to
> > > no avail.  I'm going to try running against a previous version to see if
> > > its a regression of some sort, but this problem didn't seem to exist in
> > > 1.4.1 until our systems were updated to OFED >= 1.4.  Any suggestions
> > > besides the obvious, "well, down-grade from >= 1.4"?  What additional
> > > info can I provide to help?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Brian
> > > 
> > >     
> > 
> >   
> > 
> > 
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > us...@open-mpi.org
> > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> 
> 
> -- 
> Oracle
> Terry D. Dontje | Principal Software Engineer
> Developer Tools Engineering | +1.650.633.7054
> Oracle - Performance Technologies
> 95 Network Drive, Burlington, MA 01803
> Email terry.don...@oracle.com
> 
> 


Reply via email to