On Jul 7, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: > No....afraid not. Things work pretty well, but there are places where things > just don't mesh. Sub-node allocation in particular is an issue as it implies > binding, and slurm and ompi have conflicting methods. > > It all can get worked out, but we have limited time and nobody cares enough > to put in the effort. Slurm just isn't used enough to make it worthwhile (too > small an audience).
...that being said, patches would be appreciated. :-) But, as Ralph alluded to, there's quite a history -- anyone attempting to make such a patch should probably have a phone call with Ralph to get up to speed on both the history and the why-things-are-the-way-they-are story about Open MPI's SLURM support before starting. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
