Ofcourse i checked that, i have all of this things,
I simplified the program, and its the same.
Nothing gave me clue, except the more detailed writeout of the PTP.
Here is the critical part of it:
(1.2 one, this is correct)

[Mario.local:05548]  Map for job: 1 Generated by mapping mode: byslot

  Starting vpid: 0 Vpid range: 4 Num app_contexts: 1

...

...

(1.4 one)

[Mario.local:05542]  Map for job: 0 Generated by mapping mode: byslot

  Starting vpid: 0 Vpid range: 1 Num app_contexts: 1

...

...

Seems the 1.4 mapps the wrong job, Im not sure to what is it referred to,
but hope it will give you some clues.

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:

> Just to check what is going on, why don't you remove that message passing
> code and just
>
> printf("Hello MPI World from process %d!", my_rank
>
>  in each process? Much more direct - avoids any ambiguity.
>
> Also, be certain that you compile this program for the specific OMPI
> version you are running it under. OMPI is NOT binary compatible across
> releases - you have to recompile the program for the specific release you
> are going to use.
>
>
> On Apr 17, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Mario Ogrizek wrote:
>
> Ofcourse, its the same program, wasnt recompiled for a week.
>
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <string.h>
> #include "mpi.h"
>
> int main(int argc, char* argv[]){
> int  my_rank; /* rank of process */
> int  p;       /* number of processes */
> int source;   /* rank of sender */
> int dest;     /* rank of receiver */
> int tag=0;    /* tag for messages */
> char message[100];        /* storage for message */
> MPI_Status status ;   /* return status for receive */
>
>
> /* start up MPI */
>
>
> MPI_Init(&argc, &argv);
>
> /* find out process rank */
> MPI_Comm_rank(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &my_rank);
>
>
>
> /* find out number of processes */
> MPI_Comm_size(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &p);
>
>
> if (my_rank !=0){
> /* create message */
> sprintf(message, "Hello MPI World from process %d!", my_rank);
> dest = 0;
> /* use strlen+1 so that '\0' get transmitted */
> MPI_Send(message, strlen(message)+1, MPI_CHAR,
>    dest, tag, MPI_COMM_WORLD);
> }
> else{
> printf("Hello MPI World From process 0: Num processes: %d\n",p);
> for (source = 1; source < p; source++) {
> MPI_Recv(message, 100, MPI_CHAR, source, tag,
>       MPI_COMM_WORLD, &status);
> printf("%s\n",message);
> }
> }
> /* shut down MPI */
> MPI_Finalize();
>
>
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> I triplechecked:
> v1.2 output
> Hello MPI World From process 0: Num processes: 4
> Hello MPI World from process 1!
> Hello MPI World from process 2!
> Hello MPI World from process 3!
>
> v1.4 output:
>
> Hello MPI World From process 0: Num processes: 1
>
> Hello MPI World From process 0: Num processes: 1
>
> Hello MPI World From process 0: Num processes: 1
>
> Hello MPI World From process 0: Num processes: 1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 17, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Mario Ogrizek wrote:
>>
>> Hahaha, ok then that WAS silly! :D
>> So there is no way to utilize both cores with mpi?
>>
>>
>> We are using both cores - it is just that they are on the same node.
>> Unless told otherwise, the processes will use shared memory for
>> communication.
>>
>>
>> Ah well, I'll correct that.
>>
>> From console, im starting a job like this: mpirun -np 4 Program, where i
>> want to run a Program on 4 processors.
>> I was just stumbled when i got same output 4 times, like there are 4
>> processes ranked 0.
>> While with the old version of mpi (1.2) same execution would give 4
>> processes ranked 0..3.
>>
>>
>> And so you should - if not, then there is something wrong. No way mpirun
>> would start 4 processes ranked 0. How are you printing the rank? Are you
>> sure you are getting it correctly?
>>
>>
>>
>> Hope you see my question.
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 17, 2010, at 1:16 AM, Mario Ogrizek wrote:
>>>
>>> I am new to mpi, so I'm sorry for any silly questions.
>>>
>>> My idea was to try to use dual core machine as two nodes. I have a
>>> limited access to a cluster, so this was just for "testing" purposes.
>>> My default hostfile contains usual comments and this two nodes:
>>>
>>> node0
>>> node1
>>>
>>> I thought that each processor is a node for MPI purpose.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm afraid not - it is just another processor on that node. So you only
>>> have one node as far as OMPI is concerned.
>>>
>>> Im not sure what do you mean with "mpirun cmd line"?
>>>
>>>
>>> How are you starting your job? The usual way is with "mpirun -n N ...".
>>> That is what we mean by the "mpirun cmd line" - i.e., what command are you
>>> using to start your job?
>>>
>>> It sounds like things are actually working correctly. You might look at
>>> "mpirun -h" for possible options of interest.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Mario
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 16, 2010, at 5:08 PM, Mario Ogrizek wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I checked the default MCA param file, and found it was there that was
>>>> (automatically) specified as a relative path, so i changed it.
>>>> So now, it works, altho, still something is not right.
>>>> Seems like its creating 4 times only 1 process.
>>>> Not sure if it has to do something with my hostfile, it contains:
>>>>
>>>> node0
>>>> node1
>>>>
>>>> I am running this on a simple dualcore machine, so i specified it as a
>>>> localhost with two nodes.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't understand this comment - a dual core machine would still be a
>>>> single node. Just happens to have two processors in it.
>>>>
>>>> Could you send the contents of your hostfile and your mpirun cmd line?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Mario
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Mario Ogrizek <
>>>> mario.guard...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I understand, so, its looking for a
>>>>> working_dir/usr/local/etc/openmpi-default-hostfile
>>>>> I managed to run a hello world program from the console, while my wd
>>>>> was just "/" and it worked, altho strangely...
>>>>> example for 4 procs:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello MPI World From process 0: Num processes: 1
>>>>> Hello MPI World From process 0: Num processes: 1
>>>>> Hello MPI World From process 0: Num processes: 1
>>>>> Hello MPI World From process 0: Num processes: 1
>>>>>
>>>>> So, you are saying i allways have to be in "/" to run mpi programs, or
>>>>> there is a way for mpi to search absolute path?
>>>>> It seems pretty inconvinient this way.
>>>>> I think v 1.2 didnt have this limitation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this have to do anything with LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Mario
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> How did you specify it? Command line? Default MCA param file?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 16, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Mario Ogrizek wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any idea how to solve this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Timur Magomedov <
>>>>>> timur.magome...@developonbox.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>>> It looks that you hostfile path should
>>>>>>> be /usr/local/etc/openmpi-default-hostfile not
>>>>>>> usr/local/etc/openmpi-default-hostfile but somehow Open MPI gets the
>>>>>>> second path.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> В Птн, 16/04/2010 в 19:10 +0200, Mario Ogrizek пишет:
>>>>>>> > Well, im not sure why should i name it /openmpi-default-hostfile
>>>>>>> > Especially, because mpirun v1.2 executes without any errors.
>>>>>>> > But, i made a copy named /openmpi-default-hostfile, and still, the
>>>>>>> > same result.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > This is the whole error message for a simple hello world program:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Open RTE was unable to open the hostfile:
>>>>>>> >     usr/local/etc/openmpi-default-hostfile
>>>>>>> > Check to make sure the path and filename are correct.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> > [Mario.local:04300] [[114,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not found in file
>>>>>>> > base/ras_base_allocate.c at line 186
>>>>>>> > [Mario.local:04300] [[114,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not found in file
>>>>>>> > base/plm_base_launch_support.c at line 72
>>>>>>> > [Mario.local:04300] [[114,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not found in file
>>>>>>> > plm_rsh_module.c at line 990
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> > A daemon (pid unknown) died unexpectedly on signal 1  while
>>>>>>> attempting
>>>>>>> > to
>>>>>>> > launch so we are aborting.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > There may be more information reported by the environment (see
>>>>>>> above).
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > This may be because the daemon was unable to find all the needed
>>>>>>> > shared
>>>>>>> > libraries on the remote node. You may set your LD_LIBRARY_PATH to
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> > the
>>>>>>> > location of the shared libraries on the remote nodes and this will
>>>>>>> > automatically be forwarded to the remote nodes.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> > mpirun noticed that the job aborted, but has no info as to the
>>>>>>> process
>>>>>>> > that caused that situation.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> > mpirun: clean termination accomplished
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > ps. PTP is a parallel tools platform plugin for eclipse
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Mario
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> > users mailing list
>>>>>>> > us...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>>> > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>> Timur Magomedov
>>>>>>> Senior C++ Developer
>>>>>>> DevelopOnBox LLC / Zodiac Interactive
>>>>>>> http://www.zodiac.tv/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> users mailing list
>>>>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> users mailing list
>>>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> users mailing list
>>>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> users mailing list
>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> users mailing list
>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>

Reply via email to