1 - Do you have problems with openmpi 1.4 too? (I don't, haven't built 1.4.1 yet) 2 - There is a bug in the pathscale compiler with -fPIC and -g that generates incorrect dwarf2 data so debuggers get really confused and will have BIG problems debugging the code. I'm chasing them to get a fix... 3 - Do you have an example code that have problems?
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 15:01 -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote: > I'm afraid I don't have any clues offhand. We *have* had problems with the > Pathscale compiler in the past that were never resolved by their support > crew. However, they were of the "variables weren't initialized and the > process generally aborts" kind of failure, not a "persistent hang" kind of > failure. > > Can you tell where in MPI_Init the process is hanging? E.g., can you build > Open MPI with debugging enabled (such as by passing CFLAGS=-g to OMPI's > configure line) and then attach a debugger to a hung process and see what > it's stuck on? > > > On Jan 25, 2010, at 7:52 AM, Rafael Arco Arredondo wrote: > > > Hello: > > > > I'm having some issues with Open MPI 1.4.1 and Pathscale compiler > > (version 3.2). Open MPI builds successfully with the following configure > > arguments: > > > > ./configure --with-openib=/usr --with-openib-libdir=/usr/lib64 > > --with-sge --enable-static CC=pathcc CXX=pathCC F77=pathf90 F90=pathf90 > > FC=pathf90 > > > > (we have OpenFabrics 1.2 Infiniband drivers, by the way) > > > > However, applications hang on MPI_Init (or maybe MPI_Comm_rank or > > MPI_Comm_size, a basic hello-world anyway doesn't print 'Hello World > > from node...'). I tried running them with and without SGE. Same result. > > > > This hello-world works flawlessly when I build Open MPI with gcc: > > > > ./configure --with-openib=/usr --with-openib-libdir=/usr/lib64 > > --with-sge --enable-static > > > > This successful execution runs in one machine only, so it shouldn't use > > Infiniband, and it also works when several nodes are used. > > > > I was able to build previous versions of Open MPI with Pathscale (1.2.6 > > and 1.3.2, particularly). I tried building version 1.4.1 both with > > Pathscale 3.2 and Pathscale 3.1. No difference. > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Thank you in advance, > > > > Rafa > > > > -- > > Rafael Arco Arredondo > > Centro de Servicios de Informática y Redes de Comunicaciones > > Universidad de Granada > > > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > us...@open-mpi.org > > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users > > > >
