Hello! [Note! PISM and PETSc mailing lists are removed from cc list.]
Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com> writes: > On Dec 17, 2009, at 5:55 PM, <kevin.buck...@ecs.vuw.ac.nz> wrote: > >> I guess this means that the PISM and PETSc guys can "stand easy" >> whilst the OpenMPI community needs to follow up on why there's >> a "addr.sa_len=0" creeping through the interface inspection >> code (upon NetBSD at least) when it passes thru the various >> IPv6 stanzas. > > Ok. We're still somewhat at a loss here, because we don't have any > NetBSD to test on. :-( We're happy to provide any help that we can, > and just like you, we'd love to see this problem resolved -- but > NetBSD still isn't on any of our core competency lists. :-( I know another person who's interested in OpenMPI, perhaps he can provide testing environment with limited access. It would be nice, if you'd comment my message <87638a89yx....@inbox.ru> and either apply patches or explain what is wrong with them. In particular getifaddrs part is the most interesting, RPATH issues can wait and I admit that they may require more testing. > FWIW, we might want to move this discussion to the de...@open-mpi.org mailing > list... I'd prefer some way that doesn't fill my inbox with yet more unrelated mail. Is there a way to subscribe for posting only? -- HE CE3OH...