Hi,
Its C bindings and if I clear the picture a bit more, what it does is
partitioning the original matrix in to a set of sub matrices to be processed
by the a other processes. And it seems that the only option left is to
bundle off in to a temp buffer before sending as you have suggested. It
would have been nice if there was a derived data type to do the trick :) ?

Thanks,
Prasad.

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Terry Frankcombe <te...@chem.gu.se> wrote:

> Which language bindings?
>
> For Fortran, consider pack or reshape.  (I *think* whether array
> sections are bundled off into temporary, contiguous storage is
> implementation-dependent.)
>
> Isn't it easier to broadcast the size first?
>
>
> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 11:53 +0530, Prasadcse Perera wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I'm writing an application which requires sending some variable size
> > of sub matrices to a set of processes by a lead process who holds the
> > original matrix.  Here, the matrices are square matrices and the
> > receiving process doesn't  know the size of the receiving matrix. In
> > MPI_Bcast, I have seen that we can broadcast a whole matrix. Is there
> > a similar way to do this with a derived data type for the matrices
> > which we can send a matrix without looping the blocks ?.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Prasad.
> > --
> >
> http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/MemberArticles.aspx?amid=3489381
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > us...@open-mpi.org
> > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>



-- 
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/MemberArticles.aspx?amid=3489381

Reply via email to